SPO-30/SPO-32 L-150 Soviet/Russian Third Generation RWR 'Dead Zone' Issue

you still havent posted a single source about the SPO-32 also known as the L-150 Pastel
image

https://web.archive.org/web/20230203013916im_/http://library.voenmeh.ru/jirbis2/files/materials/ifour/book2/book_on_main_page/15.13.3.htm

your own source agrees with me

image

and here is a source on your beloved spiral antennas, and guess what, it also says that they have ±30° of elevation coverage

image

This is a cylinder spiral antenna. Learn electronics.

Please don’t leak secret documents

SPO-15 also limit on ‘±30 degs’, then what?

Which one is secret?

learn what a source is

you have nothing to show but your “deduction” (rather speculation)

you havent produced a single source that agrees with you

The Mig-29B book is downloaded from Mycity forum;
SPO-15 one is a educational metarial;
SPO-32 page from Voenmeh is public.

Source is what u accept, is it?

Calm down bro, it was just a joke

lol nvm

sure SPO-15 and SPO-32 are totally the same and lets just ignore what the manufacturer has to say about the SPO-32 just because we dont like it

Your argument
1.‘±30degs limit’ description means ‘the system can only detect signal within the limit’.
2.SPO-32 has this description.
1+2->3. SPO-32 can only detect signal within ±30degs.

I gave a counterexample to your proposition 1 from SPO-15 document, so you cannot obtain proposition 3 is true. What’s the problem?

that you dont have a source

SPO-32 =/= SPO-15

  1. The disk is a antenna;
  2. The other type antenna cannot be fitted into the disk
  3. SPO-15 gave an existing example, that it’s a planar spiral antenna
    1+2+3=>4. The disk is an antenna if(3) and only if(2) it’s a planar spiral antenna.
  4. If it is, it receive signals from high elevation.

Say what ever you want. I’m busy.

IDK if you understood that, but THE SPO-32 IS NOT THE SPO-15. If you want an analogy, you cannot say that x = 1 by “saying that y = 1, therfore x = 1”. You need to specificaly demonstrate that x = 1.

Angular coverage for spo-15 is the same as l-150 at ±30. I don’t get why you’re trying to argue using spo-15.