Your right it does make your statements irrelevant.
Going to keep putting words in my mouth or are you going to learn to scroll?
Yesterday I had a moment when it took 3 PARS hits to take out 2S25 Sprut 🤦♂️
I would say that PARS is on the same level as Hellfire in terms of lethality, they are both very poor.
Hellfires are receiving the new atgm mussle buff the mavericks get as well
Talking to you is always without fail, a waste of effort.
Going to keep putting words in my mouth or are you going to learn to scroll?
Didn’t know Signor is Steelbeast in disguise.
Bit of projection now eh?
I was not aware that Steelbeast named dropped the PARS, oh wait.
Where PARS mention?
Makes you wonder why bring it up even then (cause it was you who did). Oh wait, you were trying to change the goalpost righttt.
Ye, a waste of time on my part (especially given you went full on defensive for simply being called out, and proceeded to completely change the topic away from your actions to what the person before you said via a tu quoque fallacy… you also forgot that it was you claiming that PARS is allegedly better than Mavs and that I came here to fact-check that, now you’re just acting like you haven’t talked about it at all, lol).
- makes the statement that I quote “name dropped the PARS” when I did none of the sort
- proceeds to make a deal out of such while evidence to the contrary exists within view along with stating that I made the statement to begin with
- claims I changed the goalposts when my argument has not changed on the matter beyond responding to retorts
- claims I made personal attacks as a argument when I stated a fact, you came in here and attempted to make the discussion about the AGM-65 into one about the PARS
I dunno if you are just trying to gaslight me at this point but it would need work if so.
Months later and nothing has happened.
Gaijin seems to be very interested in fixing bugs.
Namely not at all!
Likewise, the new generation Spike ATGM has a range of 10 km and not something like 6 km like in the game.
But Gaijin is still asleep, while in conflicts this type of ATGM is successfully used against tanks.
The lr2 have a 5.5 km range from ground vehicles, the 10 km value likely from rotatory or fixed wing aircrafts.
On the brochure that it is liked, on the same page that you used, states that the range is “up to 5.5 km”
Here in it states that they have a 10 km range when it is lunched from the air
https://www.paptecnos.com/spikelr2/
that’s correct in a brochure of the spike LR2 it says 5.5 km ground and 10 km air
It doesn’t really matter how big the range is if the Spike doesn’t even work 2% as well as the original and delivers its performance!
The fact is that this problem has existed for over a year and hasn’t been fixed.
I always thought there were capable programmers there, but that doesn’t seem to be the case.
1 Like
1 Like
kinda late but yeah this means a massive buff for the spike LR2 and rn there is a bug report in process for making the penetration much better
1 Like
I don’t think this is much needed fix, since apparently the code for top attack does not work, tweaking stats probably won’t help much.
this is an attempt to fix top attack read carefully and you can see the angle
And ? No amount of penetration changes the fact that Spike (an other) goes horizontally through thickest tank armor instead of going through vertically through thin roof armor.
Nah I don’t think so, I don’t see anything in those stat which would affect impact angle, but feel free to elaborate…
yes, but the penetration buff would still make it go trough even if it hits a hard part
Max g-load, loft evalation, target angle to acceleration multiplier
pretty much everything plays into it, it can now climb higher and turn faster /more in a short time
1 Like
Does not matter…
Do you know why?
Because when it comes to impact angle, all those missiles acts like beam riders. Impact angle angle is determined by mutual position of launch vehicle (or launch position) and target, not the missile vector.
Lofting is sadly in term of impact angle just optical gimmick.