Spall Liners on the boxers

So does gaijin have something against the boxer or something because after years, they still won’t give it, it’s spall liner. There is considerable documentation and photos regarding its spall liner, but nothing has happened. So basically I just wanted to bring attention to it. Feel free to comment other vehicles they won’t give spall liners to.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jR55gjdOZpCm

2 Likes

Its Gaijin, so unless its soviet, a light tank/autocanon tank with spall liners is clearly a marketing lie :P

3 Likes

There isn’t even a Soviet light tank with spall liners?

1 Like

BMPT does if you count it

1 Like

btr 82at has one

1 Like

Does that thing even count with all its crew holding hands…

1 Like

Far from a light tank.

Its got half decent mobility, its got an autocanon, its got ATGMs, its better than most light tanks offered by other nations and got spall liners day one

1 Like

still technically has one tho, mind you it doesnt even have a spall liner in the front, only the sides

2 Likes

Its down 7-10 hp/t compared to MBTs…

yeah but like theres so many photos and documents proving it now it is just ignorant if they dont give it one

Yep, Ajax has an accepted report too.

They like nerfing western stuff like that

1 Like

Its still got decent mobility. I dont know why soviet mains like to pretend its slow

1 Like

they wont even accept reports for the boxer

1 Like

Boxer MGS has an accepted report

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hSiewRvo43mZ

but accepted and fixed are 2 entirely different things unfortunately

The fact we have a second boxer still not fixed… clearly shows they arent interested in adding spall liners

1 Like

Is OK Comrade, Stalinium will protec you from frontal attakk!

st,small,507x507-pad,600x600,f8f8f8_CROP

4 Likes

it’s closed so I’m not sure if it really counts, and my report is for all the boxers.

Its accepted. Look at the label in the top right. Its closed because it was accepted and forwarded, if it had been dismissed that would say “not a bug”

for example, dismissed but accurate report:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zwZf7KIQ8Kba

true true, but they wont do anything with that little info and from so long ago

You dont know what sources were submitted but most people cant view, if it wasnt enough information it would say “not enough info” like this report:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pGTbGs8IVP1z