its been a year, do you think there was enough?
There are plenty of valid reports older than that not fixed. Should see the mountain of reports for the Challenger 2, most average 2+ years old
like:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m22cZZxaNPXJ
or
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PX7CKrwWNGdr
or
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nugZ361FLvcc
It took 3+ years for SRAAMs to get their corrected range and there are reports for the Bucanneer to get Napalm that pre-date the current bug reporting website, about 4 years ago iirc. Im sure there are many many reports that still exist on the old system, that are awaiting implementation. Gaijin can be incredibly slow. Imo, they implement reports only if/when they deem it necessary, I personally consider their statements regarding accurate modeling, this one:
as a marketing lie. They routinely make changes based upon misinformation, such as they did with BOL and have ignored reports submitted reports to fix it (including internal reports by a senior tech mod) despite their above statement (it was highly convenient that BOL was nerfed when the Gripen was newly added and performing well despite BOL being in-game for nearly a year and a half) or just outright ignore reports to correct something if it would make a notable change in performance.
1 Like
It doesn’t. Its on par with Challengers.
Okay? And?
I wouldnt call them slow per-say. Not Maus speed anyway which i would actually call slow.
1 Like
Your definition of slow is definitely, interesting…
Okay and?
Its the speed of an MBT?
Its trading that mobility for having better survivability than most top tier MBTs
To be honest, I have the EBRC Jaguar, it is full of spall liners EVERYWHERE (everywhere)… but I don’t really see the difference between a vanilla armor.
It’s supposed to deny spalls, but…
No, it isn’t. Yeah the Challenger is an MBT, however it is not considered fast, it is actually rather slow.
Okay and?
I still see BMPTs running around the matchs just fine.