SPAA should be a deterrent, not a plane attractant

And said that air is much better as I was saying.

Not to mention that nothing as You are trying to say was proved ;)

If You can’t provide anything as simple as link to sever replay then You are just making things up

Again, I don’t need to prove anything to you, and your want to paint my points out as imaginary and delusion, are just straight up bad faith.

As Eddie, the one who threw up mental health recommendations in response to being called out, said, just put me on ignore as it’s obvious you aren’t going to change anything.

Your demands for proof, are just you deriding and ignoring the point.

Obviously your bad faith is just a constant issue. What an absolute joke.

So don’t prove it and continue to make things up.

If what You were saying was true then You should be able to show it

Again, I don’t need to prove squat to you, as when I do, you deny it anyway.

You should be able to accept discussion, but it’s clear you don’t.

I can accept discussion when both sides can show what they are talking about.

I can show all the things that I describe that happen in game as I talk based on my experience not what I think can happen.

Server replay shows all and everyone have access to it, You should remember it.

You’re lying… Stop it.

Cite where I have lied

I made the comments that you could deter planes by using an SPAA effectively, and you claimed that ‘effective’ had to have kills, but that’s not what deterrent actually means.

You rocked up on that stat for months, dismissing anything I said about my stats, and that led to you constantly deriding everything I said about using SPAA, and why to use SPAA because you merely seen I had a bad KDR with it from your opinion.

I told you my stats don’t matter to me, as the team does.

You ignore this each and every time, yet demand that I prove to you what I say… As I said, I don’t need to, because you’ll just deny it anyway, and you are fixated on the stats and kills someone can get, ignoring the actual point that was made.

And that shows that you’re genuinely, absolutely, beyond reason, and hope, of having a genuine discussion.

Put me on ignore bud, because you ain’t changing anything. I keep you off the ignore list because I want to know what trash you’re saying about me as it’s often you running your mouth.

And asked You to show it.

You mean that in order to be effective against something You need to be able to do something to it? Shocking.

You can put me on ignore as I will always point out when You are talking about what You imagine not what really happens

Spoiler

image

all german spaas guns with a huge firerate and the wildest damage left the chat.

soviet spaas with laserguns and the same wild damage left the chat.

all spaas with brownings left the chat.

all spaas with radar and ols (but without he-vt) left the chat, etc

now there are simply no bad spaas in our game.

1 Like

Most non-radar SPAA are open-toped meaning the rockets shot outside of SPAA effective range can destroy them by simply landing near them (no need for hit), same goes for bombs.

Radar SPAA have effective range of around 2km max, meaning You can still destroy them and avoid any shots (especially in helis).

So sorry, if You are dying to them that is just a skill issue.

You can check my service record and see that I know what I’m talking about ;) (if You want to make an argument that my ground kills are AI, then You can distribute all of my 516 AI ground units destroyed in air modes throught all the planes I have used in RB).

Not necessarily, the trucks and the ZSU-37 are not very effective at dealing with planes.

the yensei and shilka are the only spaa that ill actually be evasive of when I’m flying because they have a radar and do a notable amount of damage if they hit

No, the rubbish ww2 ZSU-37. Fine at dealing with tanks, but trash at its intended role

In the Future… take personal disputes to PM… Thanks!..

Who is this to, because there’s nothing personal about someone ignoring the genuine points made just to rub stats in faces.

Thats is the definition of a personal Argument… has nothing to do with the thread, it is just argument between two or more persons… and it will be taken to PM and kept there

Nah, I’m cool… The fact hey can’t actually discuss something without calling for proof and egging on about how bad someone is, it’s clear as to the reason they do this, and it’s quite wrong that it’s allowed to continue.

I don’t need those sorts of PMs. They are free to add me to that ignore list themselves as their friend also advocated they do, who is also someone who attacked me personally on the forums.

1 Like

There’s a lack of SPAA options so its left few choices that and most have seen vehicles as nothing more then offensive engagements never defensive.

Same lol, It’s annoying to be revenge CAS’d lmao. imagine being revenge bombarded with a ton of 305mm HE shells.