Soviet 10.3 Lineup

ZTZ-96A sits at the same 10.3 while being superior.
And there are a number of superior 10.7s as well.
So if T-80UD is “OP” then so are many 10.3 and 10.7s, not just T-80UD.

Also your post is defending the T-80UD.
My posts are analyzing capabilities while providing no opinion.
T-80UD’s BR doesn’t impact me. I’m never going to own it, and I know the weakspots. So on a personal level it doesn’t impact my play. I can only do my best to analyze its capabilities and understand other peoples’ experiences.

Russian ground 9.7 and above has been overpowered for a while. But people in this community go muh reverse speed and gun depression and overlook how insane the discrepancy in armor and firepower (and spaa capability) compared to every other nation, now it took yet another OP premium for them to start to realize…

… ussr doesnt have great suto cannons? What.

BMPT’s are blatantly undertiered and the UD should be 10.7 as it’s better than the other Soviet 10.3’s.

They’re good for their BRs, but that’s it. NATO evolved while those cannons haven’t.
CTAS40, Bofors 40 was updated, 30mm Bushmaster even, etc.

The T-80UD has identical mobility to the T-90 which is by no means a slow tank. It lacks thermals sure but that is hardly a huge negative in 10.3/10.7 as most vehicles get thermals of pretty poor quality. The T-80UD is in a br bracket where 105mm cannons are still very prevalent. These cannons are a LOT more unreliable than the 125mm with 3BM42. The armor of the T-80UD is better than other tech tree equivalents for russia at that br while having higher hp engine. It should by all means be 10.7

The T-72B is literally the T-80UD with a worse reload and lower hp/t and its the same br as the T-80UD.

6.5s reload in 10.3 is pretty damn strong with that armor, mobility and gun.

1 Like

A tiger 1 can go through the huge lower plate on that tank. The armor is significantly worse than the T-80UD which also has higher HP/T

The T-80UD is better than the ZTZ-96A. Thermals dont make that much of a difference in that br range

edit: ZTZ has slower reload too btw.

2 Likes

I love seeing you on the forums, it makes my day. Let’s decifer this post you made

The T-80UD has better mobility than the ZTZ96A by a long shot. 1000hp and 60 km/h top vs. 800 hp with 59 km/h top. Yes ammo is the same and the 96A does get thermals (also worse armor).

Yo this isnt true at all. Ariete P mobility is worse than Abrams and 2A4, and obviously has worse armor. It gets DM33 to compensate (honestly it is a good vehicle for me, but I doubt it would be for you). Ariete P is also at 10.7

Cant argue with the mobility, but also gen 1 thermals isnt really a buff. Additionally T-80U armor on the UD should compensate and make them both 10.7

False on mobility

It seems you finally learned how to look at a statcard, good job I congratulate you

Again this is completely false, it should be 10.7 and would be perfectly balanced there

I am basing all my experience on the T-80UD/BE, which is the exact same as the UD but at 10.7 and with thermals.

In my opinion the T-80UD/BE should go to 11.0 (or 11.3 with proper model and 1200hp engine and Pakistani ammunition, this I would much prefer)

T-80UD should go to 10.7

The only reason the UD is at 10.3 is because it is a premium vehicle and the people who buy it suck at the game, thus bringing down the stats. If you use it properly it is basically a top tier tank at 10.3 but with BM42 (which honestly you can use at 11.7) and the speed of a T-64AM. This thing needs to go up in BR ASAP.

As for the original post, you will just have to wait for the BMPTs to go up in BR. It will happen maybe next update or next time they do BR changes. As for the general situation regarding Soviet 10.3, it has always been slightly overpowered, but except for the T-80UD and the BMPTs I don’t think that it is game breaking. I find it perfectly easy to counter (T-72s are the easiest tanks to counter if you know what you are doing), the only ‘hard’ tank to deal with is maybe the 2S38, but it’s not even difficult to counter, just annoying. As for the T-72AV, that shit should go to 10.0 or even 9.7

@XxBLAZEFIRExX
Me: “T-80UD could easily be 10.7.”
You: “I 100% agree with Alvis.”
SoyBean: “I too 100% agree with Alvis.”
Proof we’re in agreement:

??? This dude is on drugs bruh

Bro literally offered only reasons why it shouldnt go up to 10.7 (which I disproved) then talks about how he always said it should be 10.7

My post was giving reasons why it can easily be fine at 10.7.
I never in my life said T-80UD shouldn’t be moved up.

You said “10.7? Maybe.” Im just proving that it SHOULD DEFINITELY BE 10.7

And you said several things that were just wrong which i corrected you on.

Please learn to be more clear.

1 Like

He DMed me to get me to take down my posts because it was ‘inappropriate’ and ‘copying his takes’. He also called my post confusing which is incredibly ironic lmao