Which again is land based tests and therefore not usable for WT
3 Likes
Not sure the reason for the Haiku but this makes no sense to the topic here.
so you agree there is nothing to support these ludicrous stats. thanks
4 Likes
This is simply a clarification of the B-37 gun’s accuracy. Many are trying to cite the tests of 1937-1940, without taking into account that the gun was replaced in 1941 with a different version, with different survivability and accuracy characteristics.
4 Likes
and those survivability and accuracy characteristics are what?
3 Likes
You’re simply asking me to photograph the moment when a Soviet engineer reduces the amount of gunpowder in his charges by a couple of kilograms.
Your complaints are at this level, so no matter how you try to prove injustice, you will spin in place because you have NOTHING
2 Likes
You are trying to add a variant of the B-37 cannon to the game, which was abandoned due to its low performance characteristics.
1 Like
and was this “different version” ever mounted in its full triple barrle turret, on a ship and tested at sea?
If not, then any and all results from those tests should be totally inadmissable within WT.
Either that or allow ALL ships to have accuracy based upon tests of the same kind, which would increase the accuracy of British 15" guns by more than 4x
3 Likes
I have an even better proposal: we can take the first prototypes of the gun, thereby worsening the accuracy of the British 15-inch guns.
2 Likes
And then lets only add the parts of Soyuz that was actually built. Remove all the parts that werent
4 Likes
Im just asking for evidence to support any of these so called facts.
No mate, was commenting on your claim on the difference it made. another unsabstanciated claim of performance when there is no eveidence to support it.No mate, was commenting on your claim on the difference it made. another unsabstanciated claim of performance when there is no eveidence to support it.
1 Like
On one condition, the war will not start.
just wait till we get lion and N3 and see how they complain. even better if they make it the heavy Lion class design. see how they are fine with paper stats then.
Yeah. though wait for it have worse firepower than repulse
1 Like
9 x Upgraded/improved 16 inch guns with 18 inch belt armour and 9 inch deck armour lol
Ah, but clearly marketing lies.
3 Likes
This is probably the funniest thread I’ve ever read
2 Likes
Well, in fact, if you don’t take into account hidden nerfs, the Project 23 battleship won’t change, because, unlike players, the developers have access to the state archive.
2 Likes
Which prove what exactly? The ship was never built and therefore the stats are entirely paper and as a results, its stupidly OP
4 Likes
Ah yes, the soviet main finds it funny that the soviets have a ship so game breakingly OP that most players have stopped playing top tier naval
Especially funny given the soviets have always been notoriously bad at anything to do with their navy.
Look at in game.
1 of their Rank VI is a paper ship, never built. Another is British (that had to be scrapped when returned ot the British due to poor maintenance) and the third is Italian.
Their only Rank VII ship and the only option they had for any Rank VII ship is a paper ship that the soviets would have never been able to build
4 Likes
Instead of 6 players, now 4?
There was still a lot of time before 1945.