Sovetsky Soyuz is blatantly Overpowered

Game Discussion Arcade Battle
681

If you break the autoloader, then yes (but a 30-second repair won’t allow you to reach a 4-minute reload)

Documents about the Project 23 battleship began to be declassified around 2010, but even so, we can’t even look at the high-explosive shells (which were never even created)

This conversation will be endless, since there are simply few facts about the test, and those that exist do not correspond to the period of combat use.

Take a picture of the barometer, increase the pressure in the room and see how bad you feel, take a picture of the barometer with the new pressure

1 Like
682

Well, the B-37 version used until 1940–1941 has been replaced, so it’s not used in the game. The accuracy of the new version is known only from tests conducted in 1941–1945 and during Operation Iskra (the weapon’s high effectiveness was noted).

1 Like
683

So basically, Soyuz run on copium spec that can’t even prove it can do what it said.

2 Likes
684

Which again is land based tests and therefore not usable for WT

2 Likes
685

Not sure the reason for the Haiku but this makes no sense to the topic here.

so you agree there is nothing to support these ludicrous stats. thanks

3 Likes
686

This is simply a clarification of the B-37 gun’s accuracy. Many are trying to cite the tests of 1937-1940, without taking into account that the gun was replaced in 1941 with a different version, with different survivability and accuracy characteristics.

2 Likes
687

and those survivability and accuracy characteristics are what?

2 Likes
688

You’re simply asking me to photograph the moment when a Soviet engineer reduces the amount of gunpowder in his charges by a couple of kilograms.

Your complaints are at this level, so no matter how you try to prove injustice, you will spin in place because you have NOTHING

1 Like
689

You are trying to add a variant of the B-37 cannon to the game, which was abandoned due to its low performance characteristics.

1 Like
690

and was this “different version” ever mounted in its full triple barrle turret, on a ship and tested at sea?

If not, then any and all results from those tests should be totally inadmissable within WT.

Either that or allow ALL ships to have accuracy based upon tests of the same kind, which would increase the accuracy of British 15" guns by more than 4x

2 Likes
691

I have an even better proposal: we can take the first prototypes of the gun, thereby worsening the accuracy of the British 15-inch guns.

1 Like
692

And then lets only add the parts of Soyuz that was actually built. Remove all the parts that werent

2 Likes
693

Im just asking for evidence to support any of these so called facts.

No mate, was commenting on your claim on the difference it made. another unsabstanciated claim of performance when there is no eveidence to support it.No mate, was commenting on your claim on the difference it made. another unsabstanciated claim of performance when there is no eveidence to support it.

694

On one condition, the war will not start.

695

just wait till we get lion and N3 and see how they complain. even better if they make it the heavy Lion class design. see how they are fine with paper stats then.

696

Yeah. though wait for it have worse firepower than repulse

1 Like
697

9 x Upgraded/improved 16 inch guns with 18 inch belt armour and 9 inch deck armour lol

698

Ah, but clearly marketing lies.

2 Likes
699

This is probably the funniest thread I’ve ever read

700

Well, in fact, if you don’t take into account hidden nerfs, the Project 23 battleship won’t change, because, unlike players, the developers have access to the state archive.

1 Like