Sons of Attila - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

Ok but the first one is definitely a trailer and the second one is more like a feature breakdown, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a trailer like that before.

1 Like

it just how it developed, short one is a teaser because it shows small stuff and needs to get analyzed, while the trailer shows everything coming yes, even staff like smin refer to the first video as teaser, just has been like that since for ever, i think gajin just changed naming way at one point but it was stuck to everyone like this

something tells me the j-11 isn’t coming anywhere near when the “real” version comes

So what happened ?

I don’t see why it wouldn’t, the model would be there, the loadouts would be there, there would be no balance concerns, there would be a lot of demand for it and a hell of an uproar if they didn’t add it.

What’s your reasoning?

1 Like

You know the big google doc with all the missile stats on it?

they did a joke and had the AIM-9X and IRIS-T up for about 5 mins, a bunch of people started harassing them on discord for it so they took down the google doc.

It’s also missing FAPDS still

2 Likes

Wtf just over a joke on a word sheet jesus this community is toxic

1 Like

Yeah pretty much, hopefully the doc comes back and the assholes that threw a fit realize they were making a huge fuss over nothing and that the google doc was a huge service and a great source of information kept up to date for free by passionate members of the community who don’t owe us a damn thing

3 Likes

same reason germany gets it’s russian planes 6 months later

1 Like

I’m hoping they take the F-16 approach instead of the MiG-29 one. But you right, it’s definitely possible, I’d just like to think that Gaijin learned from their previous mistake.

1 Like

Mhm data miners are the only people I highly respect in this community.

1 Like

well aware but that is a “balancing” decision

Why not China gets copy pasted a Mirage 2K-5 this update and receives J-10 when Israel gets their Lavi?

1 Like

ha, as if, gonna eat a broom if germany is getting a mig 29 with r73 access and not 1 patch later. If gajin would have learned sth of their previous mistake they wouldnt have raised the br to 12.3 before britain and sweden even got their first 12.0. generaly they are catering to much to russian and us air lately

Israel is getting a Lavi? First I’m hearing of it. The Lavi seems unlikely to come to the game anytime soon, maybe as an event vehicle or premium but probably not the tech tree.

And China will probably get a 2k-5 when the MICA comes.

We were talking about the J-11 my guy, learn to read.

If the 9.13 isn’t getting R-73 then what makes you think the 9.12 will. My bet is that they’ll get them when the SMT gets the R-77, it would actually make sense then.

“”“maybe as an event vehicle or premium but probably not the tech tree.”“”

If happens, we basicly have more reasons to review bomb than the first one. Gaijin should get actively punished if it happens.

Otherwise, we surpassed Lavi with Block 40. They might not introduce a prototype with no information on loadouts

so u didnt mean with this that f16 got delivered to all nation that used them and mig 29 1 patch later to germany, pretty much sounded like that to me? in that sense what i wrote make sense

germany used other mig 29 variants, the natofied one , they could have added that one and give it R73 access easy

If we can find a source saying it was planned to use Sparrows then maybe it’ll come to the TT but if it’s just another AIM-9 only light fighter then I don’t see a place for it in the TT, you gotta remember Israel only has 3 branches, there’s not a lot of room for stuff like that.