I guess for the Typ 64 rocket on the Typ 60 ATM?
As bad as the rocket might be, i use them very decent. sometime the rocket going slower helps more then going super fast.
And the Typ 60 APC chassis is suprisingly survivabel
1 Like
i guess? tbh youd probably be better off asking for the crazy shit south korea has been coming up with. i think they have a bit more to choose from
Wildcat on Leopard (1) and Wildcat with 2x4 Stinger missiles offered to Canada in the competition that would later choose ADATS
2 Likes
huh…
that first picture is… interesting
The Lower Plate.
Navalized PH2000 turret, it was certainly a project of all time
1 Like
looks like we’re back at the “swap ground/naval artillery” methods, 21st century version.
Gotta look into it now
Im really hoping they come through with the Type 81(C) this update I really dont want the Type 81 with the IR missle
1 Like
The PzH2000 would make a great SPG as it is a very powerfull and with a 3 sec reload with laser range finder. On top of it can fit in more then one techtree
What do you mean by “Offer”?
I suspect we won’t get J-10A until we get J-11A. Wargames between the two aircraft revealed the J-10A having both a stronger BVR(better missiles and radar) and BFM(better sustained and instantaneous) capabilities. Plus war games against Gripen C/D showed J-11A was worse in BVR but better in BFM.
1 Like
However in said BFM engagements the Chinese had far superior Short range missles which is also a factor.
1 Like
3 Likes
Chinese were using PL-8B as the standard at the time. Honestly not sure how PL-8B performs as a missile as compared to R-73 but my understanding is J-10 pilots primarily succeeded most using hit-and-run tactics against J-11 with radar off, something like a 4:1 kill ratio at best.
PL-8B is much more advanced than R-73 and can only compete with R-73M
2 Likes
It wont be this update just to clarify. We are very much aware of people’s wishes for one and working hard on it. But its a somewhat complicated situation.
12 Likes