Gripen I can see, but I don’t expect AMRAAMs on F-15s until 13.0.
@As_H3
Apologies for my previous statements about your posts. I’ll retract them.
1 Like
Apparently it was hinted at in the dev stream ( need to go watch it, was at work) but had some issues. It could still make an appearnace with the next update. but it also doesnt necessarily need to come with the update either
Probably, Gripen, FA2, Maybe even this F-16, I think were all meant to have AMRAAM, F-16 they bodged Aim-7s onto it, but others, not a chance. This is also why R-27ET made an appearance, they were intended instead of R-77. (at least that is my theory)
But I do agree on the F-15 with AMRAAM, I expect F-15, Typhoon and something equivalent soviet ( i dont know my soviet jets that well) at the same time
2 Likes
It’s more so acceleration & energy retention, as well as ability to whip about.
I only state it when people claimed Soviets had the best 12.0 fighter in the game on live when Germany shares a Mig, and F-16s are effectively equivalent.
Apologies if that comes off as much nit-picking the German Mig-29, it’s not that. It’s purely critiquing the nation-bias argument at 12.0 live server.
Maybe, but with such a huge feature, I honestly think we would’ve seen it by now.
Especially on a low performance plane as a test bed in the dev server, just in case it’s broken and needs to be removed for fixing.
Any hints they’ve dropped about unreleased content or features is probably eluding to the Olivia leaklist with Ships, T-90M, and some other small things.
Well right now i can’t say much maybe thing get better on live update only time will tell that this update will be good bad or ugly
1 Like
I’d say, give it a week and we’ll find out, I think it was MAWS plus Betty causing issues, so they ditched one for now and stuck with the one for all. But I think it could still make an appearance.
1 Like
Wouldn’t call the T-90M a small thing but you know lol
really not sure what to think. i’m upset abt britain getting not an awful lot of meaningful stuff (I mean i have the sea harrier SQN vehicle already)
1 Like
Gripen sure, but not the F-15s. If anything they’re probably holding back on the F-15J (not reliant on AMRAAMS) so that they aren’t flooded with US players whining about how they aren’t getting two top tier jets this patch.
1 Like
oh hey i missed the fun
That is true too. Though Im also not entirely sure what else they could add with the Typhoons to keep it balanced. Unless they add the F-15 first with no AMRAAM, but I think thbat would lead too to much suffering again. No way minor nations can stand against Even early early F-15s In my opinion without additions like Typhoons and maybe later version of Gripen, etc
Gripen can use Skyflash. Wouldn’t be too amazing but the flight performance would probably help. Not like there aren’t other planes that are lacking good BVR because AMRAAM was their main BVR weapon.
F-15Cs didn’t get AMRAAMs until the 1990s, over 10 years of service without them.
So we can get MSIP F-15C & J with AMRAAMs/AAM-4s later on.
But at this point everything is like 1995. That just feels like throwing the F-15 to the wolves. Especially if everyone else is firing off AMRAAM. This is one time where I think id feel a little sorry for the US
My advice would be to pick up a superpower techtree.
We’re going to be Cold War and early 2000s for the foreseeable future, (no, f22 & su57 will not come) and they’re the only ones who fielded enough technology, with enough variety, to consistently have additions and interesting gameplay.
we missed you too :)
2 Likes
Though, at that point, its basically just a viggen no? It would basically be a side grade. Yeah, probably better flight stats, but not directly better
Well they’re standing against the F-14 just fine so I don’t see the problem with adding an F-15 or Eurofighter now. Sweden however has the missile problem, but maybe they should have considered operating SARHs from it.
Now in the current state of the Barak 2 i don’t see it finished without aim-7‘s and Phyton 3 which were used on it