No… we’re getting F-15s this year more than likely for 12.3. Just without AMRAAMs and without Aim-9Ms, because those weapons aren’t for that low. Rank 9 isn’t even a hint of possibility right now either.
Bombs probably not but fuel tanks should come yes.
Yeah rank 9 will be a while.
If no AMRAAMS yet, what do you reckon the Gripen C will come with this year?
well, i know that some J35 Version had bombs like for example this one ( File:Saab F-35 Draken (cropped).png - Wikimedia Commons ) but not sure about the XS version… I hope that yes
.png#/media/File:Saab_F-35_Draken_(cropped).png){kind=link}
Gripen C will probably be December patch and bring AMRAAMs with it, it would be dumb to not give it its main A-A armament when its added.
1 Like
I guess F-15A from USAF & F-15A Baz from IDF minimum 12.0, and F-15C (USAF), F-15J (JASDF) & F-15C ‘Akef’ (IDF) pre-MSIP without AIM-120 getting 12.3 but F-15J pre-MSIP or F-15J basic could get AAM-3
Personally, I think Gripen C better Gripen A 3 things such as GBU-12 Paveway II, GBU-49 Enhanced Paveway II, Rafael Litening III targeting pod, IRIS-T (Rb.98) & Cobra helmet mounted display (HMD), but for modern IR AAM IRIS-T (Rb.98) dev not add 2023-2024
AMRAAMs, as Gripen is a far less capable platform than F-15C.
@Chronos30 Tanks have FAR more compression than air. Tank compression starts at 2.3, whereas air compression starts closer to 7.0.
1 Like
We need different BRs for planes in ARB and GRB.
3 Likes
More Soviet/Russia objects from 80s-2010
Its not that serious, tanks will continue to be decompressed with the new planes, same as what they’ve already been doing.
No we don’t. BRs for ground attack aircraft are fine.
Oh wow didn’t know.
Yeah thats what I think too.
Ah i see. Thought you mean AMRAAMS in general. That makes sense.
BTW, how do we quote multiple posts like the previous forum? Am not allowed to do three replies in a row…
Anyways, regarding the post asking for different BR’s for air and ground RB:
Definitely. I would go as far to even say that we need different BR’s per load out.
Changing it for air/ground RB modes is probably more reasonable to ask for indeed.
Example of weird br’s now:
Vautour IIN Early 9.0 because of bombs and/or 4x guided air to ground weapons. Also has 4x AA-20’s.
Vautour IIN Late 8.7. only has 4x AA-20’s/ 4x SARH missiles. Waaaay better at Air RB but has a lower BR…
I just @ the person.
To quote you just highlight & right click quote.
Bombers are more survivable than fighters.
No vehicles would have their BRs changed with suc ha feature.
& decompressing ground would make the feature useless.
I see.
I’ll take your word for it then since I don’t play much ground. Just notice some odd BR’s in air sometimes like that Vautour issue.
Now let’s see if my earlier prediction was correct…Milan for GE later today (Bastille day).
Sadly Gaijin wont implement it. They said they tested this idea and some vehicles became really OP
So… Can we expect something for Bastille Day today ? Would be a bit sad not to have at the very least a decal…
The thing is the United States, USSR, and Germany really aren’t out (M1A2S, M1A2 SEP V2, M1A2 SEP V3, M1A2 SEP V4, TTB, T-90M, Object 640, Object 195, T-14, T-90AM, T-80 Burlak, T-90 Burlak, Leopard 2E, Leopard 2 PSO, Leopard 2A7, Leopard 2A7+, Leopard 2A8, etc) tanks and decompression in ground would be lovely so some br ranges that as destroyed by way better tanks being only 0.7 and 1.0 brs higher makes them nearly unplayable or just perform very poorly.
2 Likes
Yes! Was expecting this: