Let me disagree, it’s funny how you see some gaps and not others. French tanks went through years from 9.7 to 11.7. In the case of air, in realistic mode, gaps are not a problem. I play the German tree and my main problem for years is the lack of CAS options to play combined battles, or the few options in general that the German tree offers in the middle ranges to play tanks + planes. I’d tell you that the German air tree was abandoned years ago, when we got into cold war technology, except for some boring Soviet additions in the last few years and I don’t see any problem going from ICE to EF. In the best case, you give Germany some of the planes that they never used, but that they evaluated (as in the case of Japan or Sweden).
well PSO has its improvements, add on side armor, frontal add on side armor is debated it can actualy can equip them just never seen with it, but the important part is way better thermals!
Besides that baseline 2A7 has no improvements to the 2A6, we would need the 2A7V
Or 2a7+
I mean we have evidence that GCS-1 can target ground vehicles after a certain someone put it in everyone’s head that it can’t, but of course nothing is done about that. We have evidence the XGCS-2 had a warhead and conducted accuracy tests after a certain someone put it in everyones head that it was just a separation test with 0 functionality, but nothing was done about that. We have evidence pointing an F-4EJ mounting a GPS reciever, but a certain someone pointed to the wrong antenna and used that as evidence that it didn’t. He who shall not be named has done immeasurable damage to the A2G capabilities of Japan creating massive hurdles in burden of proof while loadouts have been added to planes from single pictures.
The ROC F-5A never even mounted the bullpup computer irl, but gets them in game, while the EJ is denied A2G weapons because of a lack of proper computer systems.
Dude, Challenger 2s are literally fine MBTs. AJAX would take time.
I want T-90S as a Britain tech tree fan, it’d diversify the lineup.
@BearHasLanded
If Thai comes [obviously not this update], then Japan will get Gripens.
And we don’t know what Japan will get, SK is certainly an option, but not the only one.
German air is stronger than Britain. Germany has 2x more 12.3 - 12.7s before Eurofighter.
F-4F ICE can even get Aim-9Ms at some point if it carried them.
@Fa11enPhoenix
Imagine Tornado F3 at 13.3 with ASRAAMs and AMRAAMs.
yes but seeing how the + is even stronger i doubt gajin would make it the next step
2? what is there besides the f-4f ice and please dont start with an early or late version
Leo PSO was built using the Leopard 2A6EX body in the DEMO II variant with the Euro Powerpack powerplant, on which the Leopard 2A5 turret with the Rh 120 L/44 cannon was installed. Q Did 2PSO have 1650 l/s from A6EX?
F4F ICE and IRIS-T
I don’t think Germany ever got AIM-9Ms, but they did produce their own version of the AIM-9L with IRCCM, that being the AIM-9L/I
Europowerpack with 1200kW. I cant tell you about the l/s
The top tier in ground machines is Germany one of the strongest nations, the hardest to play is Russia which needs a little love and it is necessary for Russia to add quality machines, preferably T90M and T90MS, it would be enough for a start
I agree which is why I have stated multiple times that Britain getting an SAAF tree a top priority for them, Germany will manage a little longer with the F-4F ICE and then Italy a little longer than that with the F-16ADF.
sweden is a better germany in ground, germany is lacking top tier vehicles, russia got a lot of attention in the recent patches it is time for other tech trees to get some love, russia ground is in no need to a new vehicle right now
1600 h.p
Dawg don’t do that to me.
Also should probably have put her in the far left instead.
Don’t tell me you’re serious right now. Isn’t that right?
As the owner of two completely branches, I laugh at your message.
Agreed, I forgot about Sweden, so Germans and Swedes rule all.
great another russian troll
No Russian troll, these are facts.