Sons of Attila - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

Nope, Argentina’s most modern fighter in the year 2023 is an A-4 and with Austria you get the F-5Es they loaned from Switzerland and then the Eurofighter, nothing that actually helps the German tree at all.

While the Nagato would be very interesting, the person who made this edit forgot something, the crew tag under the vehicle card
rn_image_picker_lib_temp_ea4f97ae-92fa-4441-b337-dae98bfff9cd

2 Likes

It would honestly be hilarious if even Japan got Nagato already while all U.S has been and is getting is eternal-reload per-WW1 Dreadnoughts.

1 Like

Oh right I didn’t know that.

But hey still cool to see an Alpine tree. As Austria can fill a lot of gaps in the mid to high tiers.

There are older versions of JAS 39 Gripen, version C mentioned here was put into service in 2004s, whis is IMHO a little late for this phase of WT development. But there is version A, which flyes from 1988.

argentia sub tree, please go ahead and tell me what other intresting vehicles it would have that would help the german tree

As I said I didn’t know and I actually asked a question about that

with what?

a J35Ö that doesn’t have AAMs until a year before it went out of service?

pre owned Tranche 1 typhoons?

SAAB 105Ö that are already implemented?

or do you mean the bunch or Prop trainers they armed?

1 Like

Good point

After searching for a subTT for germany, it could be the Netherland

if anything a swiss tree would work

an austrian one would just be essentially bad side planes for the experts to try around with (which I don’t oppose, imagine an AAM free J35Ö at 9.3)

1 Like

I do like the idea of mixing Foke-Wulf and Fokker.

i answered to the argentinia question, they are very small pretty much only the tams which all are in the game already, but yes, netherlands, poland or switzerland would be the best sub tree options, while netherlands and switzerland would be better since poland could be a standalone tree

1 Like

the problem with sub trees for Germany is kinda that either you take a colonial approach like with britain and south africa, in which case there are no Possible sub trees

or you take a political and roughly geographical approach like with Sweden and Finnland (both share neutrality and are close to each other) and then you either have to consider half of europe or narrow jt down a bit and are left with nothing anymore

and if you’re trying to go by culture or language you’re gonna have the problem that germany itself doesn’t even have one culture and doesn’t fit together under that metric either so there are no more nations left to consider for that part either

1 Like

I just think that France need more Swiss sub TT than Germany but it’s just an opinion

2 Likes

that is true tho, they need anything they can get at every BR except top tier

1 Like

What does France have to do with Switzerland?

when was that posted? looks like old forum

part of Switzerland speaks french

that’s it

1 Like