ehh should i know it? is that a special vehicle?
So long as it’s at least 1.0 BR below top tier an event vehicle is basically fair game, it make more sense for them to go to the country that used them than the country that sold them so an Indian T90 in the British tree at 10.7 or less is completely fair and anyone arguing otherwise is just some weird gatekeeping asshole.
It’s the earliest Mustang variant in the game
Plus I want them gone so I can sell mine at the highest lmao
It’s not about need, it’s about making the game friendlier to players & providing variety in tech trees.
Switzerland is fine in Germany.
2 Likes
Problem with lack of toptier MBT is soon to be solved, as the Czech goverment intends to buy over 70 Leopard 2A8 tanks from Germany and Slovakia is going to choose its next MBT soon, too (probably also Leopard, as they have a few 2A4s already in service just like Czechia)
2 Likes
well slovakia was intested in the KF 51 as well if i remember right, so that could be intresting
we just got 2a4s
So many messages from Germany and no one noticed that Germany only sells in WWII ranges? This game is just about selling, some years ago.
Gaijin’s policy changed, it was proven many times. See the preferential treatment that Sweden and its fantasy vehicles have. Why did Sweden receive a sub-tree before other nations that needed it perhaps more and have been in the game for years? Easy, Sweden sells.
Gaijin’s new policy, from the C&P, will invade the German TT with Soviet clones, don’t wait too long.
IDK what other nations need a sub tree yet but Sweden was a pretty good candidate for it, Finland has a nice diverse set of vehicle that are already in the game and provide a little additional flavour to the Swedish tech tree which would be pretty anemic otherwise.
And what is this about fantasy vehicles?
1 Like
Uh, yeah. Half their country was forced to use Soviet hand-me-downs for ~60 years. If anything we should be surprised that there aren’t more GDR units in that tree.
japan and israel,
italy on a lasser scale
Japan sure however there aren’t any sub trees that fill it’s needs, Italy will need it soon but right now with the F-16ADF it’s fine, and Israel is totally fine with it’s own vehicles, it one of the few nations that has actively been in conflict since WWII
i am one of those guys that believes korea could go to japan xD
Italy needs a subtree for ground, it still lacks in many areas, mainly top tier and overall armor.
It could it just doesn’t help them right now that much, they would get the F-5E but I believe Korea’s next fighter is the F-16C which isn’t here yet.
it isnt needed for air, but it is needed for ground, pretty much all the sub trees are more important for ground where line ups are needed inc ase of japan korea could have given actual spaa systems wayy sooner
I’m not too well versed in ground battles but I believe that for ground trees it doesn’t have to be a sub tree necessarily, like the British AA line gets a Canadian ADATS because Britain doesn’t have a good AA alternative, there is some flexibility there it seems anyway, however like I said, ground vehicles are not my forte so I’ll leave that conversation to someone else.
The OP said Swedish sub tree so I assume he was talking about air as I know Britain at least has a South African ground sub tree.
Japan needed it much more than Sweden and for years.
Italy needed him more than Sweden.
If you’re not going to consider that Sweden is a relatively new nation, then Israel also needs it a lot more.
Hell, Germany or France were less competitive than Sweden at the top levels even before they got Finland.
The T-80U and Mi-28A do not belong there. Not to mention the Japanese F-16 and others…
1 Like
I didn’t say otherwise. I just mentioned that Gaijin’s plans are going in that direction, but everyone seems to ignore it.
You seem to have misunderstood the message.
I will be clearer, if Japan sold like Sweden, Japan would have already obtained a sub-tree (almost 100% SK, although never underestimate the gaijin’s imagination to legitimize their greed)