Some F-16’s have 6x AIM-9L. One of the best jets ingame.
Did you forgot the F-4F ICE is a thing?
F4F ICE is a slightly modernized F4S (yes the american prem) and you want that to fight Stuff like MIG-29S F-15C and a Gripen ?
And the Kurnass 2000 is just a slightly modernized F-4C…
As you can see they dont stand a chance against the next generation of fighter jets, they were modernized to have a cheap jet to temporary defend themselfs. When germany recieved the F4F ICE in 1993 it was already outdated its not enough against those i mentioned but that was never the intention, giving the MiG-29 its R-73 would be the best this also makes the F4F ICE unnecessary, the only difference of this phantom is the use of AMRAAMs and AIM-9L but the aircraft itself is the same it can be easily outmanouvered outclimbed and outrun, the Kurnass is even worse and this can be seen in the statistics.
Su-27 Flanker-A unfinished closed project with big problems, reincarnated for T-10S Su-27 Flanker-B. I think it has no place in tech tree
Im not sure if it should be added in the first place there are cooler alternatives like the MiG-23-98 thats a highly modernized MiG-23 and thanks to the ability to use R-27 & R-77 missiles it makes a very good event aircraft for the future.
also like mig-21-93
exactly they are strong enough to be in the TT but also rare enough to be used as event aircraft.
Date doesn’t matter much, even if some plane is from 2023, it fits current meta and there is enough info, it can be added.
Let’s say dev consider Gripen A or Gripen C without ARH BVRAAM Rb.99 (AIM-120B) next major update
So I guess like Shenyang J-8F but good Air-to-Ground armament
I love how we can’t talk about Turkey that might be the next nation via decals and interviews. But it’s fine to talk about a plane that has zero evidence other than hear say.
Absolutely another disaster.
Well i think the reason most are requesting the Gripen is cause the other options would be Norwegian/Danish F-16 or a Finish F-18 Hornet
It could come as a stopgap before the early Typhoon.
Not bad, l want them.
Nah, I think for F-16A Block 20 (ROCAF), F-16C Block 30 & F-16CG Block 40 (USAF) air-to-ground armament better Gripen C
Funny egnuth i have seen if i recall corectly, the last Norwegian F-16 that was in use
sweeden tends to get the short end of the stick in terms of air to ground arnement unfortantly
Tell that the SAAB-105G at 8,3 with full ballistic computers