Pretty much, AV-8B+, AMX, Typhoon, F-35A & B is about it. Maybe the M-346 & F-104S ASA/M just for the sake of adding “something”.
For the UK, Italy, Germany, Sweden,. France and Japan there really isn’t a lot left that can be added for the air trees.
Ok then lets make a correction.
Did İtaly operate Tornado F3? Yes they indeed did.
On the other hand he claimed İtaly didnt have those F3s.
And man you are really looking for a easy way to access all those shiny new toys without actually grinding their trees.
still no problem as anti-ship missile is not ‘bomb’. Especially Termit cannot pop-up, meaning that it’s going to hit side armor not deck armor.
Even in case of pop-up anti ship missile things won’t be that different. Currently 1000 lb bomb can kill CA and BB because Gaijin remove mechanism of deck armor stopping HE bomb from getting inside, and bombs can be delay its fuze freely. Not something that matches to anti-ship missile.
Gaijin already test with Komoran on Marinflieger Tornado about Active Radar Homing missile. Not a huge damage even in the case of 6.0 cruisers. Harpoon/Exocet will not have different destiny. For Soviet anti ship missile, they would be better, but still not a thing that could ‘bury’ battleships.
They could get av8b+ i guess. Its something.
i dont even play britain and wouldnt start it because it will be to similar to germany top tier,
but you are denying diversity to other trees without reason only because you dont want US toys in other trees and britain has a reason to get a Grippen they did use a trainer Grippen for more then 18years and we already have trainer aircraft in the game that got weaponized , there is no reason to not give britain a Grippen
I can’t be the only one who doesn’t like this large scale of unrealistic vehicles.
Silly vehicles like rocket cars facing 1940s designs just because the stupid rocket firing car isn’t that good.
Or a car with a 20mm autocannon facing T-34s, Sherman’s, because it would never compete in the era it was designed in (why was it added then? If it sucks?)
And this donation of vehicles.
I don’t want to face a T-90S which isn’t even available in the designed/manufactured nation (USSR/Russia) on the British team purely because of a complicated historical relationship between the T-90S operator and Britain.
Wtf?
(And yes, if you dig through my posts and come at me, I am against most if not all western vehicles in Ukr Tech tree, except for those from nations not in game, like Poland Pt-91 Twardy)
I got a DM coming m8
Guys I’m telling you I got the most a 100% real leak ever of new tech tree item.
But if you unlock it you will be banned
Do you not understand a single thing from my words?
İ said Gripen shouoldnt come to British tech tree under SA branch before adding Eurofighter Typhoons.
After Uk recieve its best toy Gripen will be welcome addition, also training version of Gripen didnt operated under RAF colours there for your anactode about arming and givin into British tree does not make any sense.
And yes Germany shouldnt get single F-15, so either grind Usa tech tree or other one’s whos operating F-15 primarily or stop bringing F-15 into discussion cause at this point even Frances deserves to get F-18 and F-15 more then Germany.
The UK grippen flew under the official ETPS and was marked as such, it is part of the military
So, we will have them in naval EC, they will explode every DD staying at their spawn and take kommuna or kronsh in 2 min of match. Nice.
The ETPS is neither part of the RAF or RN… and that Gripen, unless I’ve gone blind, is still carrying the insignia of the Swedish Air Force… because that’s who owns it.
Again I don’t understand because it doesn’t make sense, it just sounds like needless gatekeeping, if they add a South African tree before the Typhoon then the Gripen will go in that tree, it’s insane to assume otherwise, it would be like Germany not getting the MiG-29 just because that is also Russia’s current top aircraft, your argument just doesn’t make sense
We have a French P-51 with US markings in the French tree.
ETPS was the contract providier for both sides in order to train RAF pilots in Gripen.
Even Gripen does have ETPS symbol rather then RAF on that picture and last time i checked Empire Test Pilots School wasnt exactly equal to RAF.
Cool story, whats your point?
Which one ?
Markings means nothing so we could have a marked SAF in the British tree if gaijin wanted too.
Though they will most likely pick the SAAF Gripen C.
I still don’t know why you’re telling me this.