Yeah…
That do be a certified USAF “air superiority aircraft/interceptor” moment
From what I remember, only like one or two squadrons’ worth of F-15A/Bs were upgraded via the MSIP II program in 1985, since the original MSIP I program (dedicated to the A/B models) was cancelled.
Funnily enough, F-15C was the same as the A until 1985 with MSIP II, so no CMs…
Ah, then that would mean a “no Countermeasures” F-15A
So the R-73 was in service before most F-15 were carrying flares, that’s wild
We have era “relict” with settings from booklets of developers. That may work in two sides…
Yep. I think the Israelis had their own program in the early 80s to put CMs on their Eagles, but it may have also been around the same time as MSIP II
Maybe.
Possibly not depending on if Su-27 is superior in internal testing or not.
@someweirdname
Mig-25s are at best 11.0.
Mig-31 for a better one, but even then that’s still 12.0 likely.
well seems like su 27 is a long way away then if those 2 should come first
So where is todays stupid guesses at leaks? i wanna have a laugh at peoples stupid fakes
Missed these two that seems to have slipped into the trees today, as well:
Is this from the F-16 loadout server leak
I guess early event vehicle aircraft rank 7 for USSR maybe MiG-25P
MiG-25 all variants never mounted R-73
I guess AIM-7P specific to early 4th gen fighter aircraft from USN/USMC (F-14D & F/A-18C) only but 4th gen fighter aircraft from USAF could get AIM-7MH
Su-27S Flanker B equivalent F-15C pre-MSIP (USAF) with AN/APG-63 PSP radar, IR AAM AIM-9L/AIM-9M & SARH BVR AIM-7M/AIM-7MH, and Su-27S some better F-15C pre-MSIP because equipped helmet mounted sight (HMS)
I guess F-15A Early no CM, carry AIM-9J & AIM-7E-2/AIM-7E-3 but F-15A MSIP II or F-15A late fitted AN/ALE-40 CM, carry AIM-9J/AIM-9L sidewinder & AIM-7F sparrow
F-15 Baz from Israel some like F-15A MSIP II (USAF) but integrated Python 3 and extra countermeasures
Like how yak141 was equipped with working radar, irst and could use any weapons at all?
You mean those “facts”?
this will be a great move… korea didn’t have their tanks during ww2 as far as I know… so its totally justified… I’m looking forward to Korean tech tree in japan (just as south african in britan)
The dude was complaining about having to write a bug report because the devs won’t act on his forum rants.
The Yak-141 was a perfectly fun addition to the game, it’s hardly like some paper plane than never even flew, it was a project that got to late stage testing and was abandoned because of politics, the devs have done a good enough job implementing it with a realistic interpretation of what the final product might have been.
Can you guys go away please.
Who ever does these fake list should have their account banned
Well they just today announced how South Korea, Japan and Usa are increasing their security cooperation, so now it might actually be acceptable.
AKA rules for thee and not for me.
IDK what you’re on about, the Yak-141 wasn’t just made up, some gaps were filled in but it is grounded in history, this ain’t no MiG-28
But it is funny and it gives the it is not confirmed until it is in a blog or on the dev server vibe
They already skipped the Su-11 & Su-15 i could see them also skipping the MiG-25 why would they do that, its actually simple they have only missiles all of them have ONLY missiles the Su-15 can equip gunpods but you have to decide between gunpods or missiles, but the MiG-25 cannot apply gun-pods at all so its stuck to its missiles, and how do you want to balance that its either too high and useless or too low and destroys everything so they prob. decided to skip it. A good alternate variant would be the MiG-31 which is from 1981 it fits the meta and has an internal gun.