Yeah, I dont know if Britain has any more Chally 2 variants that would be appropriate, and I doubt Chally 3. So probbaly just Light tanks/IFVs for Britain, maybe a decent SPAA. But with Indian T-90, I could maybe see us just getting Commonwealth stuff like more Indian vehicles, which would kinda suck
Not sure why you want 2PL to be 11.7.
You forgot M1A1 AIM is at 11.3 with a better projectile and is better in basically every single way? I don’t see how DM53/63 would validate 2PL moving to 11.7, when the difference between KE-W and DM53/63 fired from L/44 is just 40mm’s, it would basically be its gimmick against the AIM being better in other areas.
But in any case, if it does go to 11.7, ye i’m all for it. Germany doesn’t have a line-up at 11.3 anyways and 2PL is always taken to top tier.
3 Likes
Y’all like to half ass everything. Also the Burak II never used AIM-9M irl, where do y’all got the source from?
5 Likes
All Mig-29s have their historical armament as proven via manuals and even photographs.
Not a single aircraft in WT has a fictional loadout, not even F-16C/D with AIM-7Ms.
@FurinaBestArchon
Funny how you admitted to being a Soviet main and are attempting to have F-4F have its correct missiles removed. F-4F should keep those meta missiles no matter how much you complain how allegedly OP F-4F is.
Funny how you call reality fantasy when it has to do with the Germans.
DM43- 586mm
KE-W- 610mm
60 degree 2000 meter pens. KE-W is barely better.
DM53 is 700mm of penetration at 2km out of L55, 90 more pen than KE-W. 662 out of L44.
Anyone using flat pen like this is WW2 needs a reality check.
ALL composite armor is angled plates.
Even the Abrams front hull is angled interior composite plating.
@C_NNY_ARCHIVE
All F-16Ds are compatible with 9Ms.
If you count F-4M/K not getting AIM-9L as fictional, then yes, yes there is. There is also the Hawker Hunter F.6 which could carry 4x AIM-9s, in game they have SRAAMs which were never in service with the Hunter.
4 Likes
Vehicles not having something is not fiction.
SRAAMs were tested on many aircraft, one of which included Hunter F6.
agreed!
^^^this
Sort of is, Canberra could carry Nords, it doesn’t have them in game, can carry a 4000 pounder, not in game, the Arado 234C never had cannons, it does in game,
1 Like
Arado 234C was slated to have guns for production, thus was given them.
Prototypes are different than production vehicles.
1 Like
When will you understand that you just stating your opinions won’t automatically make them undeniable facts…?
1 Like
Over 29 years ago before I was born.
You also replied to a post where my only opinion was “Likely the October update”.
The rest were observations or in the case of 2PL, a consequence of giving it a meta round.
AIM-9Js are in the F-4E manual. There’s your citation.
And no, the only people that I have thought of as fanboys of Russian equipment are people that praise Russian equipment as superior to all other equipment.
Dont bother, he switches his arguments when they stop working for him
6 Likes
The R-73 has no business being fired at 10.0 or lower aircraft. The Su-25T and 39 are perfect where they are at 11.3.
And why should strike aircraft carry as many of them as the top of the line fighter jet?
2 Likes
Dude, you got upset with me because I wanted KF prototypes for Germany.
I’ve never switched arguments in my life.
2 Likes
my brother in christ you spent the 2 days beforehand saying germany shouldnt get any Rheinmetall products and that Germany deserves it
2 Likes
I’ve never once said that in my life.
I’ve exclusively said “Germany should get Rheinmetall prototypes.”
2 Likes
The F.6 in game didn’t use Aim9’s, however it was tested with SRAAM’s. Also the British phantom’s not getting 9L is not a historical issue, it’s a balancing one.
AIM-9s were in service with Hunters, SRAAMs were not
still an incorrect loadout
4 Likes