Classic gaijin fixing things the wrong way… Stock HEAT moment again. Lmao.
Overall there was like 3 questions i’ve seen asked anywhere. They again picked just the easiest most useless questions from the bunch.
3 Likes
What about the PSO amor without the dozer blade.
13 Likes
Where the PSO amor without the dozer blade.
8 Likes
A: The Yak-141 has already received the R-27ET, and in the future, it might also receive the R-73. Having said this, we currently have no plans to add the R-73 and R-27ET to the current, standard MiG-29’s (9-12A and 9-13).
What a joke. What will Germany get in that case? Getting left behind once again by US & Russia despite being taunted by Gaijin as; “one of the most played nations” and “major nation”. Then again, 2PL still doesn’t have DM53/63 either and instead uses a round that never saw service within Germany or Poland…
PSO ain’t getting the glacis add-on either despite replacing the 2A6 as the new Crown Vehicle… when it’s a side-grade of the 2A5… man, this isn’t even funny, this is sad.
14 Likes
Will radioactive sun will finaly be adressed?
2 Likes
Yes, in the past three years, other countries have achieved new top-level MBTs, while Germany’s new Leopard2 has been like a clown in the past three years 🤡， The front of the Type 10 car body in Japan is thicker than the PSO, with 67t and 44.4t each!
11 Likes
Can’t find the previous discussion so I’ll repeat it here, also because I don’t see any mention of it above.
The Strv 103A should not be foldered under the Strv 101, neither should the Strv 103C be foldered under the Strv 104.
Nobody wants to play the Centurion, especially not 4 times in a row and taking away the most iconic Swedish tank by putting it in a folder instead of having it in the tree is a bad idea in my opinion.
Put the Strv 101 in a folder below the Strv 103A and the Strv 104 in a folder below the Strv 103C.
8 Likes
You’re talking about hull front composites, so why compare total weight of the tanks?
The Type 10 doubles the hull composite weight the Type 90 has.
Thats what i mean its not there.
Have you come to your senses and decided to put T-90S in the Russia tree yet?
3 Likes
I’ve asked several friends, and everyone still prefers the old version of the preview images over the new 3D ones.
Black and white photographs or film tones have a more nostalgic feel.
Is it possible to provide an option for players to switch between new and old photos themselves?
16 Likes
Folder the strv103s and the centurions. Mixing these vehicle types makes absolutely no sense…
Like rooikats and olifants.
3 Likes
They look like some shitty mobile game pics.
6 Likes
I thought you were asking if it was added
Would’ve been nice if the Barak II got the Python 4 instead of the AIM-9M or at least lost the AIM-9P modification which is honestly just a waste of RP at 12.3
4 Likes
Is there a reason why the Su25T & Su39 not carrying 2 pairs (4 in total) R73s? Would you need a real time reference? Ofcourse not, please lower the BR or give them 4 good working missiles.
2 Likes
Can we finally get a statement about the PSO’s hull armour from officials? We made the biggest non-official thread on the forums and still haven’t got any info about what the developers or any employee thinks about this. You guys can’t just shovel it away and hope that people forget about it eventually. That’s very unprofessional behaviour from Gaijins side which im not really suprised of at this point.
15 Likes
Although I (and I’m sure others) don’t agree with a couple of the decisions here, I’m glad Gaijin is being much more transparent and hope to see more of this in the future. Thank you
1 Like
Why did Britain get a copy-paste harrier with 2 less AIM-9s over a new airframe like the Folland Gnat, there’s nothing Britain can have right now to combat these new aircraft but we could at least have a decent alternative to the Hunters which are overbr’d relative to their actual flight performance.
3 Likes