Where did i say bias
1 Like
Oh, so you are not some bias complainer.
Sorry if you are not, they are just too many, and i mix up sometimes xd.
Their USA and Russia bias as they make most money but it really minor nations suffer
1 Like
its just harder to get info on modern western tanks
1 Like
People have given a ton of declassified information. It isn’t hard Gaijin just refuses to accept it and loot it all over cause some are likely from 2nd, 3rd, or 4th sources sometimes unreliable. However it still wouldn’t be hard to pick and pull from these said sources on what is being stated in all of them and if there all saying a said thing then it is likely a factual claim rather than a bias claim.
A bit off-topic but it isn’t magic it comes down to modernization, US forces had better equipment, supply chains, and air dominance. While Iraq had a military larger than the US it was often not efficient with modern doctrines or tactics due to the age of everything. Iraq did not have proper communications, logistics, tanks, or properly trained personnel. The list goes on. In this simple case, Size didn’t matter if everything wasn’t up to date, and pissing off a World Power(The US) in the past leading to the USS Stark incident was only one aspect of the culmination of the invasion.
So were the T-90s? They remained unchanged until the end of the dev server, and were entirely remodeled along with the implementation of other vehicles’ spall liners.
It would help if each and every one didn’t state a different claim or offer differing information.
That’s what information will always do it’s just how it goes. Thats how its always been.
It isn’t. At all.
Yes it is, 1 source says one thing but gets the same topics right, and 1 source will say another thing but those core topics from the previous one will remain relatively consistent.
Have you not noticed the fact that:
- the t90m had all of its modeling and features finished when dev server released, unlike a certain other tank
- only after the t90m got spall liners, they added spall liners to the challengers and leo’s
- when they did add the other spall liners, it’s obvious they rushed modeling for them (just look at the leo’s, there’s not even a hatch cut-out)
- ka50, 2s38, bmp2m, pantsir, just to name a few
You’re a russia main so it’s easy for you to talk.
1 Like
I am not. I have more % unlocked with the british tree, as well i have higher BR tanks there.
Which does not prove anything.
IIRC, the USA tree had better AA with the York, than the soviets for some time. USA bias then?
Many newly added tanks have ammo modelled in bulks, instead of individually. It is just the usual Gaijin lazyness.
B1 bis, B1 ter, PUMA at release, Harrier (IIRC) at release, a ton of german tanks sitting way lower than they should, just to name a few.
It’s not the only one though
its for balance and implementation reasons, its like saying on the F-104S.ASA came AIM-9Ls in WoC, why not give the Harrier GR.3, jaguar GR.1, FGR.2 AIM-9L and the French Jags Magic 2s, and witholding stuff from vehicles is a trend, like FOX-1s back in like 2017/2018 or something, not to mention the AIM-7F coming later than the rest, and the R-73 being able to be refitted to things the the Early MiG-29 and the MiG-23s and Yak-141, and ground vehicle autotrack, we have it for tracking aircraft, but its for balancing and gameplay reasons
even early t.64’s had spall liners lol
1 Like
political response for no reason lmao
2 Likes
No it’s not political, it’s my impression of how military equipment performs in real life versus in our video game.
Great work flagging my comment BTW, I guess you can’t bear ideas like that to stay visible.
Writing seething comments about an IRL country and conflict isn’t an “idea”.
I find it a shame that I didn’t screenshot the comment before it got flagged - just to point out how absurd it is that someone would label literal politically-encouraged anger related to IRL events as “ideas” in a videogame forum…
1 Like