Gepard is good but this will be better, imo the Tunguska was already better
If your only metric then holy you are delusional
It’s easy enough for them to forgo adding vehicles to top tier AND FILL OUT THE MISSING RANKS AND BRS IN OTHER TECH TREES, for instance, look at Sweden, it is completely missing 6.0
Same with France.
Germany doesn’t get 7.0-7.7 which they clearly should get more vehicles between the those BRs
Britain skips 5.0
Which is a travesty considering there are even more vehicles they could add there.
China is missing 7.0
I can go on, we don’t need more top tier or high tier
Gepard is good, not great
like I said about IRST, its essentially the best in the game for shooting down planes, but it struggle to intercept CAS munitions
Pantsir and 2S6 are very strong for their respective BR, those two are meta vehicles
@lolhalorocks-live
“Missing BRs” is a fake argument.
There’s 1.0 BR of matchmaker, so Sweden having a 6.7 lineup instead of a 6.3 lineup means nothing.
France having a 6.0 lineup instead of a 5.7 lineup means nothing.
Germany has a super strong 7.7 lineup of 4 free vehicles, and 2 paid vehicles.
The one with a kinetic warhead is 40km
Same system but on a different chassis.
France has 3 5.7 vehicles, and one is a weak SPAA, the other two, a jumbo, and the M36B2
And 2 6.0 the ELC Bis and the CA Lorraine
Neither of which are good
What Gepard (8.3) has to do with Tunguska (10.7) ?
Metric of what ? Can you make any sense here ?
Definitely one of the best 8.3 SPAA
It doesn’t make whole tree best.
“Target speed up to 2,000m/s”…
That’d require much more than 1,700m/s I feel…
This would be new to me, either way the 40km one is still hit to kill
The same thing that the Gepard has to do with Russian SPAAs.
But the hit to kill one is said to be 30km. So is it 30 or 40?
There is a 30-35km version
So there are 2 kinetic missiles?
Seems to be the case if what you showed is correct.
Looks like I have more to look into.
Peak
You think that line up is good?