SeaRAM is the only thing I know of
i genuinely dont think the developers realize spaa at 10.3 and above go against cas that cant even defend themselves from those missiles. no chaff, flares or good air-to-ground missiles until like 10.7 and above, and even then at that point spaas can snipe you from 20km
more like ESSM, because SeaRAM is pretty short range
“Guys, Russia been steamrolling every 10.7 GRB games recently. Camping at spawn or going to the fight lead to the same result if you’re NATO side, what do we do ?”
“Let’s add another russian top tier SPAA… yes… and another BTR as well…”
1 Like
America and some other nations already have one of the best SAMs in the game in the thing is they’re just limited by The Mechanics such as multipathing which shouldn’t work for the top tier missiles
What even the main difference between this and the Pansir S1?
I genuinely have no idea, hence my question what could we realistically expect for the other nations. Currently I either use the top tier, the one I have basically IRIS-T or in case of the US, nothing since I havent oppened it yet but even if I did LAV-AD is pretty much the next best thing after the top tier one which is sad honestly
oh yes, “the best SAMs in the game” that are useless against one of the most common russian CAS platforms
1 Like
BTR? Are you talking about the btr3 the same btr3 that is in Japanese techtry?
and the problematic helicopter radar-return… but i think if those things are fixed it will make the helicopters unusable
1 Like
And you’re ignoring the only reason they are not the best is because of the stupid mechanic that shouldn’t work on them ok
Well Helis are useless irl as soon as theres stronger AA than a flip flop and an AK
1 Like
I don’t think it will make choppers than usable but it will definitely reduce the their effectiveness a lot
1 Like
And Germany has its own Pantsir-like missile that’s actually faster and deadlier than this, but of course Russia needed another hypersonic SAM because their WR dropped by 0.1%.
1 Like
No of course no, I’m talking about the 2 bushmaster IFVs they gave NATO to “balance” the current russian bias in the game.
LMAO so what you are saying is that they are still the best because you want to ignore the fact that they are currently useless against a large set of common targets
and guess what nation already has by far the best AA to defend against these targets, oh yeah the one that is now getting an even more insane version, and has the best LDIRCM helicopter
Both true, but in the WT or any game, they need to be viable… if not for balance, well Gaijin will want people to spend money to grind them
really?
you know IRL the AH64E would be able to launch a JAGM at anything from RWR pings right?
literally just pop up and launch missiles at everything with a radar before ducking down before it can be engaged
They’re useless because they’re shit. American SPAA are worse than damn BUK. The only usable multi vehicle SPAAs are French, Italian and after recent unnerf - German.
Pantsir was usable this entire time, against everything besides highly agile targets, but surely untouchable by any munition it faced.
French and Italian work only against targets that aren’t multipathing, which there aren’t many.
German is good, but buggy as hell. And even their missile is artificially slowed down.
3 Likes
Yeah this is like the first time Pantsir was introduced.
Russia, once again has:
-The trio of the best SAMs in the game (Pantsir, BUK, Panstir SM)
-Best CAS in the game (Mi-28NM, Su-30SM2)
-Best MBTs, broken BMPT and IFVs
They literally cannot go an update without receiving a handout that makes them dominate. It’s unreal how biased the game is. NATO on the other hand gets two useless wheeled IFVs. What’s even the point of playing anything else.
6 Likes