Another time we see the “USSR bias” in a nutshell - they get underperforming BY DEVELOPER DESICION BMPT, they get their unique jet given away with BEST armanment possible, and no one seem to care?
People here said there’s no BIAS against USSR on that forum. So i wish to hear your opinions on that :3
Here`s poll to collect the opinions
lmao
your just mad that you are going to have to fight against your OP CAS missile now
export stuff is exported, what seems to be an issue? this is case for most of the nations in game.
Nah, id rather have Kh 38 removed from the game but no Su-33 for japan. Im no jet user, im upset about double standart Gaijin has, and the bias that this forum has against USSR
The less copy paste the better. Simplifies all talk about where vehicles should be added as well
what double standard?
export planes getting weapons that the country that uses them doesnt have has been the norm for years
even last update has an example of this with all the AH64Es getting JAGM MR that has not been exported to anyone
the issue is copy paste that should not exist in slightest, but more than that - its cry when something given from NATO to USSR, but not around. Some people here made me believe that they are against ANY such additions of clones, so i wrote this text just to see if its truth and the .com is as against USSR clones as its againts giving clones TO ussr
its not that deep everyone has their export models added to other trees now
This is why the the community should’ve been more hostile to copy paste vehicles from the start. Instead they don’t care until it happens to their preferred nation.
One thing I do like about the Chinese community is that they are united. if other communities had the same unity, then this game would be a lot better
Copypaste is issue, sure I agree on that. Copypaste cant be prevented to some degree (see swedish Leo2s) so we cant get rid of it fully.
Alas, decision to add Malaysian Su-30 to Japan is rather random on Gaijins part. I dont recall anyone calling for Malaysian subtree for Japan now that they have Thailand. Ultimately its not needed and should have not been added in the first place.
(tho I will admit I do enjoy the thought of bombing russian tanks with Kh-38MT, the whole “giving them taste of their own medicine” kinda way. but doesnt change a thing about me thinking it shouldnt have been added).
But, at the very least, Malaysia seems to be wester-alligned so this isnt such big issue like adding modern NATO country to Russia.
agree. I have nothing against Strv122 but plain copypaste 2a6 2a5 makes me mad
Im glad that you also find that a bad decision
It’s fine. Just like China getting Abrams is fine. People get weird over this stuff.
IMO this is no different the sweden getting finnish F/A-18s, or france getting belgian F-16s. Neither of which there was significant complaint for.
Im glad the soviet scrubs will now eat their fake bias missiles
Finland was a subtree though and benelux aswell
South East Asia seems to have become a sort of sub tree for japan to fill gaps
I just cannot wait for Soviet mains to experience KH-38MT spams
Sure, but!
Finland was at that point a well estabilished, and whats more important, OFFICIAL subtree.
Same with BeNeLux.
With Japan, only official subtree is Thailand.
Indonesian helicopters werent mentioned as being official subtree, more like “thats where they are placed right now” kinda deal, same with Malaysian Su-30.
Wait until bro realizes the upcoming planned Korean tech tree (not even North) is coming with ‘debt repayment’ Russian T-80Us, BMP-3s and BTR-80s.