"Small" rant about captured/lend lease vehicles in tech trees

Its been on previous ones, but not on the current list (iirc). Which to me is really wierd and what gives me hope it is actually going to hte soviet TT.

Because if Britain got it at 12.0/12.3 as a premium (and the first ARH premium) that was a soviet aircraft. Before the soviets did…

It would piss off both the Soviets and many British

2 Likes

Yes and no. I think that is still quite bad, as I mentioned earlier they should be based off of a particular vehicle or person, like Bong’s P-38 for example. It will give it more purpose. And it’s not like it has to be hard, just change the texture to one vehicle that was captured irl, and have personal markings on them.

1 Like

T-62 545 ;)

I would say I won’t have too much hope about that since the T-90S goes to UK TT.

Not to mention the Americans crying how much they suffer (I know most wouldn’t but there’s always the select few like the one advocating for a US MiG-29)

Yeah…

its pretty clear what they are doing. In both respects.

T-90 is the strongest MBT in our TT (outperforms the Challenger 2s in quite a few respects, would have done if it didnt loose its original shell to go down to 10.3)

its entire purpose is to bodge our TT with some “soviet bias”. It was easier than fiixng the Challengers.

This does the same thing. Add a Mig-21 as a premium and they can forget about the Tornados (and quite frankly all of our aircraft) being totally unfinished and underperforming. Such a shame. Especially as you can gurantee that this indian Mig-21 will likely be perfectly modeled, but we’ll have to wait 6 months for the FA2 to have bugs fixed

1 Like

I saw someone asking for a Brazilian Gripen NG (basically a Gripen E) to be added to the US tech tree

Yeah this is sad… Minor nations (except Sweden) suffers :|

1 Like

Yeah I don’t know what’s up with American mains, a lot seem to cry about how much they suffer and seem to think they deserve all the soviet stuff and extra help.

1 Like

The constant calls for Aim-9X is funny as well.

I cant wait for Typhoon to be added.

Once saw a US main crying J-7D with 4 PL-5B at 11,0 too OP ;)

they don’t even suffer really, well, not air anyway I don’t play ground often, but I have jets for USA, Germany, Britain, USSR, France, Italy, Sweden, and Japan and I can guarantee you they don’t

1 Like

Oh yeah the AIM-9X thread was hilarious, I think it was changed to why the AIM-9M should be buffed when people started laughing at him.

Goes into top tier with my Typhoon ib/l to trick enemies

2 Likes

ignore the MLD at 11.3, yes lets hate on the MiG-21 rip off that doesn’t even carry all aspects

1 Like

Top jets are currently copy paste furballs anyways xd.
By suffer I mean some particular problem long overdue but still no fix some not even aCkNoLeDgEd by gaijin

the copy paste furball is actually the reason I made this thread… I hate versing SU-27 and Gripen and F-15 in Gripens SU-27 and F-15s

1 Like

Yeah… I personally am okay with Su-27 versus Su-27 since it did happend irl but i really hate the furball part. I always wanted larger map and DCS-like PvPvE in war thunder (and of course, remove that one life limit in air RB, or add an air RB EC)…
Plus i wanted actually playable air PVE lol
Still I’m kind of getting off the point of the post

2 Likes

So you’re saying AIR RBEC like everyone else wants :)

3 Likes

The only thing I kinda hate about that, is VID targets in SB. Especially when you have no radar. Telling the differences between a US or UK F4 and a German or Japanese F4 is the main reason I started mud moving so much.

Kinda my number 1 concern about the Mig-21.

1 Like

I dont get why they refuse to add it

(well actually i do. they know it would be too popular and no one would play ARB)

1 Like

Indeed. SB currently is illogical as hell…