As for the bullets used I don’t have any information on what model of ammunition was used. (Secret) But the Army procurement announcement specifies the types of ammunition used in the T-84 include:
- HEAT-T
- HE - FRAGMENTATION
- APFSDS-T
- KOMBAT (ATGM)
As for the bullets used I don’t have any information on what model of ammunition was used. (Secret) But the Army procurement announcement specifies the types of ammunition used in the T-84 include:

In celebration for the upcoming Battle Of The Atlantic event, I would like to talk a little bit about Thai Submarines; Matchanu-class submarines!

Thai interest in Submarine can be traced back to the time of Royal Siamese Navy but came into fruition when the warship-procurement project was approved by the parliament, leading to the commissioning submarines for Royal Thai Navy: HTMS Matchanu, HTMS Wirun, HTMS Sinsamut, and HTMS Phlai Chumphon, all of which were built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.
After the end of WW2, as a part of the defeated, Japan was prohibited from producing military hardware, resulting in the shortage for Thai submarines, and alongside the failure of Thai Navy led Manhattan Rebellion, Thai Submarine squadron was disbanded and all 4 submarines were later scrapped.

As for Thai submarines, they are named after people with underwater powers in Thai literature. During World War 2, submarines were used in combat operations during the Franco Thai War, including escort missions to transport Marines ashore at Chanthaburi. reconnaissance of the bay and the search for the French fleet after the Koh Chang naval battle and during the Bombing of Bangkok, the Wat Liap power plant was damaged and unable to be used. Therefore, the generators from the 4 submarines are used to help generate electricity for the Lak Mueang - Thanon Tok tram line to serve the public.
Today I have found the tri color camouflag used on Thai vehicles during the Cold War to share in this.
Well, we do love our tricolor camo. I still wonder why our ROTC uniform doesn’t have a Tricolor camo as well, lmao.
Many of these old camouflage patterns are beautiful. Both on the uniform (ELRD หรือตองอ่อน ตองแก่) and the camouflage color of the vehicle. But for the ROTC uniform, I think the green HBT cloth uniform that is commonly worn is pretty.
Adding Thailand to the Japanese tech tree is acceptable, but adding chinese top tier vehicle to Japan is absolutely unacceptable!
I do understand your concern. As stated at the beginning of the discussion; If the representation of Chinese Vehicles in Thai sub-tech tree under Japanese tech tree is unacceptable and causes quite a concern for those who deem it as offensive, I won’t ask for those vehicles (Chinese vehicles) to be included under Thai sub-tech tree, but to appear in Chinese Tech Tree as its premiums.
I am grateful for your input and opinion, here is Thai VT-4

And why is it unacceptable?
Alongside Thai Sub-Tech tree, the Air Battle Over Lampang map would also be a nice addition to the update.
On December 11, 1944, 9 USAF P-51s and 7 P-38s conducted an Air raid on Thai-Japanese Northern airbases and supply lines from the Allied bases in Yunan, southern China, forcing the outnumbered Thai pilots to take off 5 of their Ki-27 to the fight above the sky of Lampang.
According to the Thai source, outnumbered Thai pilots were able to down around 4 P-51s. On the contrary, the US Source stated that there was only a single P-51 downed as a result of the raid.

I hope to see perfect trees in Thailand soon, but cars imported from China will certainly not be acceptable to some people. However, what exactly does it mean to bring up history and politics and deny it? Look at Finland (Swedish tree) and Russia, France and Germany. I’m just making a fuss about C&P (lol)
I think these vehicles should be just as acceptable as the Chinese Ki-43 is for example.
However under the condition that China also receives their own vehicles, ideally sooner, but if not at least the same update as Thailand.
I also think it would be strage to copy the best Chinese vehicles. So if, for example, the VT-4 would be added China should receive or already have the VT-4A1.
Other than that I see no issue with these additions compared to for example Russian vehicles spread to western trees like Sweden or Britain, or even the US vehicles in the predominantly PRC top ranks of the Chinese tree.
So as long as the addition is done fairly, the Chinese vehicles used by Thailand should not be an issue.
Which is irrelevant since these are export vehicles in service with Thailand. Why would export vehicles not be added when everyother nations export equipment is in other nations not to mention that China themselves use Japanese equipment why should they be special?
China should get those vehicles yes but if Thailand is added to Japan there is no reason to not add them as part of Thailand service equipment.
I really like this idea (including the Koh Chang Naval Battle). Let’s talk about many battlefields in Thailand that can be used to make maps as well, such as
Just the 5-hour Invasion of Thailand by Japanese alone can be translated into at least 3 maps already, 2 Ground maps and one Air map.
*Sky Over Bangkok
The Japanese air force attacked Don Muang Royal Thai Air Force Base, which was defended by the Thai air force. The Thais lost six fighter planes to a numerically superior Japanese force. -Wiki on Japanese invasion of Thailand

What about glorious American equipment in Chinese tree then? Besides China can get VT-4A1
I think when the bombing of Bangkok comes, we’ll definitely see a full team of ki-43 RTAF skins. 😂😂😂

I’m not sure about the weapons that are installed on the H-34 all the way up to the S-58T. because RTAF used H-34 and S-58T as a tactical air transport helicopter, used in search and rescue operations.
Thai air froce has it’s tha F-16A. Would that replace tha AJ in Japan air tree?