and it meets none of the requirements. (anything that would be unique would have been repurposed for use on other ships making it no longer unique)
It does, I have already proved such at length above.
Reminder that the O Class guns were repurposed later on for coastal guns, and that ship was accepted as a suggestion, items, purpose built for X vehicle being used later on does not remove the fact that they were built for that vehicle.
1 Like
O-class guns? It was gonna use the same guns as the Iowa class
also you just proved my point that its not unique to the ship
Lmao, re-read what I wrote my guy.
no longer vehicle specific, hence no longer usable for suggesting it
1 Like
Yet that suggestion was accepted and passed along as I mentioned earlier.
Unless we are holding German suggestion to a different standard than everyone else that is.
what ship was it?
Have you just not paid any attention to the entire comment chain I’ve been using in this argument?
O class
well? is it the montanna, yomato, iowa, or something german because you never specified what ship this:
refers to
O class was an unstarted german ship
1 Like
Roma / Bismarck sad noises
I don’t think Bismarck will have good time against Yamato or Lowa way way better in fire power and armor I wish if Gajin added the H-39 alongside Bismarck which would have 406mm guns
I did, very shortly before that in a direct response to HK which you responded to, scroll up my guy.
I’d also like you to re-read the sentence “Reminder that the O Class guns were repurposed later on for coastal guns, and that ship was accepted as a suggestion”
Alone and see if it makes a bit more sense, there is only one vessel being mentioned there.
I ask again, is there a single ship class in the game that did not physically begin construction
shouldve reworded this better cause it makes it look like you were talking about a type of gun not a ship also there’s no O-class in the german TT AFAIK
I am once again not arguing such, see attached.
My god it feels like I’m talking to a wall.
Im asking a simple question i already know the answer to, which is no, there isnt, every ship in game began construction, the montana, did not
LOL YOU’RE WRONG ANYWAYS, it got accepted because its engines got made not the guns bruh read the suggestion
literally the first thing there
1 Like
Lets introduce the land battleship P1000 Ratte.
It was planned, there are blueprints. Some parts were already existing (propulsion/powerplant, turret and guns)
So lets just get it ingame? No ofc not. WT shouldn’t ever introduce total blueprint units. Its bad enough there are still some blueprint units left, but by no means a total fantasy vessel like this or Montana should be ever introduced. Construction wasn’t even started. That some single parts or system existed won’t change this. Especially when said systems were used for other ship classes anyways.
Just look at WoWs. Which turned from a funny naval MMO into a crazy competition of mad blueprint designs, while real legendary ships just turned into cannon fodder.
Something we can partially see with the Soyuz here, which will be most likely the most powerful BB in WT.
3 Likes
I do not care about that sentiment, this entire thread is about the possible addition through the suggestion system for Montana, she meets the requirements outlined in the suggestion system to be considered for WT, contrary to what people are postulating here.