I did, very shortly before that in a direct response to HK which you responded to, scroll up my guy.
I’d also like you to re-read the sentence “Reminder that the O Class guns were repurposed later on for coastal guns, and that ship was accepted as a suggestion”
Alone and see if it makes a bit more sense, there is only one vessel being mentioned there.
I ask again, is there a single ship class in the game that did not physically begin construction
shouldve reworded this better cause it makes it look like you were talking about a type of gun not a ship also there’s no O-class in the german TT AFAIK
I am once again not arguing such, see attached.
My god it feels like I’m talking to a wall.
Im asking a simple question i already know the answer to, which is no, there isnt, every ship in game began construction, the montana, did not
LOL YOU’RE WRONG ANYWAYS, it got accepted because its engines got made not the guns bruh read the suggestion
literally the first thing there
Lets introduce the land battleship P1000 Ratte.
It was planned, there are blueprints. Some parts were already existing (propulsion/powerplant, turret and guns)
So lets just get it ingame? No ofc not. WT shouldn’t ever introduce total blueprint units. Its bad enough there are still some blueprint units left, but by no means a total fantasy vessel like this or Montana should be ever introduced. Construction wasn’t even started. That some single parts or system existed won’t change this. Especially when said systems were used for other ship classes anyways.
Just look at WoWs. Which turned from a funny naval MMO into a crazy competition of mad blueprint designs, while real legendary ships just turned into cannon fodder.
Something we can partially see with the Soyuz here, which will be most likely the most powerful BB in WT.
I do not care about that sentiment, this entire thread is about the possible addition through the suggestion system for Montana, she meets the requirements outlined in the suggestion system to be considered for WT, contrary to what people are postulating here.
So let me ask you what part of Montana was built that was unique to it?
You cant.
No what it is is yet another attempt to get something that physically never started physical construction and the inability of some people to just accept the fact it isnt coming
yeah not even sure what hes arguing about anymore, the montanna cant be added
Which went on later to be used to power local municipalities after running on test stands … Huh thats odd, sounds like thats not “unique” per your standard.
Cool, I don’t care if the vessel did or did not begin construction as it meets and exceeds the requirements set forth by Gaijin’s suggestion staff.
The O class cant be by your standard as well, yet there it is being accepted as a suggestion.
As every component ended up on another ship, it may shock you to learn that means it isnt unique anymore, and thus cannot be added
And every component listed for the O class went on to serve a different purpose other than being on the O class, but here we are with it being accepted as a suggestion.
the suggestion never said that
Repurposed guns vs every single part ending up on different ships, and you say you’re the one talking to a brick wall
So (edit Shinano not Taiho) in her BB configuration? Kaga? Akagi? that insane plan the Brits had for a frozen aircraft carrier? Pretty sure ice exists so that counts as laying down the hull.
I’ll see your 16" nukes and raise you shock cannons and wave motion gun…
As the Space Battle ship Yamato was built into the hull of the original Yamato to hide its construction it technically meets Gaijins rules as the hull was laid down…
Taiho never had a battleship configuration
she was planed as a BB then converted
they had sawdust too so there’s its deck
