Yes I know, curious that they left out that important information that would disqualify the suggestion per your standard.
engines and steel as well, but we can ignore that right, after all the engines were the main selling point of the suggestion as you tried to hint.
Shinano as a BB already got passed as a suggestion above so yes they are all good to go per the suggestion folks.
Once again, do you have even 1 picture of the ship being built at any point or do you only have the accountant records
yeah that is an issue but it still doesn’t change the rules
I do :)
Show us then
Being laid down is once again not a requirement to be suggested, we’ve gone over this like 4 times now.
100% real trust
it not its a scale model
And you are yet to answer even one question
trees exist, it still qualifies!
I was thinking of Shinano not Taiho sorry. I got them mixed up
montanna still fails to meet any of the other criteria
Oh then be happy as BB Shinano is already suggested and passed along in the last suggestion report, I linked it a bit above.
Hmmmmm no.
It literally does since theres no single unique part of it that was built, that wasn’t reused on other ships
A-150, H-44, K-1000 and USS Ohio to name a few.
here is the suggestion that is passed of IJN Shinano in her Battleship configuration
The Ohio concept is a fabrication by WG, it’s design does not even exist in the form they produced it as, its a weird mishmash of around 3 or so designs and tillman turrets.
The A-150 by comparison is as possible as Montana as there are images of the gun barrels for the A-150 project in a field after the war.
Should add that the barrels were scrapped and used for reconstruction efforts so I guess that makes them not unique as they ended up being used for civil works.
The gun barrels dont actually count as major parts (because they are literally useless on its own) unless the breeches were also made, but it looks like they weren’t, and the ship was never laid down. Suggestions specify that they have to be MAJOR parts.
Oh tnx to both you, and @Lolman345 , I remember Japan had a few planed BBs that where converted to carriers due to pre war treaties, or lack of resources and combat loss during the war, I just got confused as to which ones.
yep, wait it has the iowa name on the rear? nice
And is that your quantification or the suggestion teams stance on the matter? Such sounds like a fantastic question to ask them since I’m pretty sure you do not know the answer to this.
