- WE NEED IT
- NO unbalanced
- SOON
0
voters
1 Like
He doesn’t know
2 Likes
who?, me?
The double fuelusalge racks are not even used
ya i know but but it was considered, neither was the 4 R-77s between the engines of the SU-27/30 ohhh wait gaijin hates NATO
1 Like
how would it be overpowered? it would have NOTHING better than much other planes in other tech trees. YES it would be extremely good and maybe become the best top tier plane for america, but it’s not too much better than something like the eurofighter, rafale, gripen or SU30
MRMLs are currently on F-15C GE.
And yes, R-77 double racks are compatible with Flankers of the last 10 years which includes SM, SM2, and MKM.
Su-30SM and Su-35 were developed quite literally at the same time.
Also Gaijin obviously never hated NATO vehicles in the history of War Thunder.
Inaccuracies with all nations’ vehicles is not hatred, it’s lack of information.
i know its probably never going to get added though, if gaijin was a NATO was USA bias wed be seeing f16s with 12 AIM-120s as a 6 missile pylon, although that was a paper discussion
You can’t just claim this out of the blue btw. R-77 double racks were allegedly compatible with Su-35 because there was enough space under the fuselage for it but not the same for the Su-30s according to this accepted report: R-77 dual rack adapter | wrong dimensions // Gaijin.net // Issues
3 Likes
Maybe Gaijin will treat it like the F/A-18 and add it years late to fight Meteors and IRIS-Ts
As I replied to you in another thread, that’s a picture of an F-15C. Not an F-15EX.
that is not a F-15EX
F-15C 2040 to be percise
What???
same thing
Su-35 has the same distance between the engines as Su-27 & Su-30.
That bug report is a report on the central bar being too thick in-game, but the dimensions of the dual R-77 rack in War Thunder are identical to the IRL rack, as proven.