Shitpost.
Yea, despair here too.
1 Like
Depends on handling.
It is not like I am not waiting for reasonable arguments you keep beating around the bush.
What depends on handling .
What are you on about ive told you why the mirages are better thsn all thr platforms you mentioned.
Even with restrictions to magic 1
But you are wrong about that.
I could likely beat quite a few Viggen players in Super Étendard but beating Super Étendard in Viggen is easier.
You’ve been provided with many. You’ve been provided with an alternative. You’ve been provided with reasoning behind why the alternative would be a better investment of your time to push for. Instead, you’ve stuck your head in the ground and dismissed everything others have given you, because it runs counter to your desire to take a hatchet to platforms to suit your fantasy.
We can give you all the reasons on the planet, but at some point, we have to accept you don’t want to hear them and instead will continue to dismiss them with “That isn’t true” regardless of how much fact is (or in this case isn’t) behind your positions. We’ve done you the courtesy of engaging with you and providing you sound reasoning, but you’ve demonstrated yourself impervious to sense.
The real question is: do you have a valid argument for wanting to remove the Magic 2 from the F1 C?
I have been provided with posts about matters having nothing to so with the discussion at hand and about post that clearly indicate a lack if knowledge ragarding certain aircraft between 10.3 and 12.0
Yes.
There are 3 F.1s with the same weaponry minus one 30mm on the CT with the same performance.
F.1 is held at 12.0 by Magic 2 having the earliest model the F.1C without Magic 2 at a lower Br would add variety, fill a gap in the tech tree and make for glinteresting gameplay.
1 Like
No, you’ve been provided with very sensible and for the most part composed messages regarding why the environment you propose sending it to would be both detrimental to said environment, and in my case I even added why it would be detrimental to the platform itself when considering uptiers from the rating you suggest. But these positions do not support your argument, so you cast them aside and deem them wanting in ways you’ve not highlighted outside of to say we’re wrong, with very little in the way to demonstrate it.
1 Like
You are the one doing the casting aside.
Quite clearly as so to boot.
I gave you aircraft and clarified some performance aspects you just denied without elaborating.
That An Pogeon with a keen eye noticed that F.1C is reasonably fast is quite nice but this is not a racing game.
Well first of all it’s false, the F1 CT has more bombs and is access to ground attack, it also has a better RWR and a much more complete HUD. Then I don’t see the problem between having a similar plane between the tech tree and the premium. Finally as I explained at least 3 times above, there are elements that are not yet modeled in the game but which make the planes much more different, the F1C is limited in its external carrying of countermeasure pod while the F1C 200 and the F1 CT can carry the whole range of French pods
2 Likes
How am i wrong…
You’ve yet to say why
And i can beat F16s in the f1c easily enough whats your point.
1 Like
Even more of a reason for the early air to air focused F.1C to have Magic 2 removed and it’s battle rating lowered.
Do you know when the F.1Cs were converted to F.1-C200s or taken out of service?
Already demonstrated that there is not 3 with the same payload. There are 2, and they are of effectively the same variant so both the tech tree and premium players can enjoy it. CT and the base F1C and F1C-200 are different even aside from payload.
You want to know what would allow for that without degrading the experience of either premium players or tech tree players? An early variant specifically to have the limited AAM capacity. Which you could put your energy behind, instead of wanting to create a virtually unplayable experience in an uptier from 11.7 without all aspect AAMs facing 12.7 aircraft. You can argue all you want that it would be 11.3, but the flight model would not facilitate that. That is before we consider weaponry and defensive capacity.*
*I would also note, in your own words, you acknowledge that F1s would effectively seal club at a lower rating with: “It could be a beast at 11.3 or 11.7”
Explaining why you’re wrong is not casting aside. Screaming into the aether that your opposition knows very little and you’re the only one with knowledge is.
Nope.
Some of the F1 Cs were converted into C 200s (about half of the fleet I think) but both aircraft were in service at the same time and were withdrawn from service at the same time, it is normal that they have the same armament
2 Likes