Well first of all it’s false, the F1 CT has more bombs and is access to ground attack, it also has a better RWR and a much more complete HUD. Then I don’t see the problem between having a similar plane between the tech tree and the premium. Finally as I explained at least 3 times above, there are elements that are not yet modeled in the game but which make the planes much more different, the F1C is limited in its external carrying of countermeasure pod while the F1C 200 and the F1 CT can carry the whole range of French pods
2 Likes
How am i wrong…
You’ve yet to say why
And i can beat F16s in the f1c easily enough whats your point.
1 Like
Even more of a reason for the early air to air focused F.1C to have Magic 2 removed and it’s battle rating lowered.
Do you know when the F.1Cs were converted to F.1-C200s or taken out of service?
Already demonstrated that there is not 3 with the same payload. There are 2, and they are of effectively the same variant so both the tech tree and premium players can enjoy it. CT and the base F1C and F1C-200 are different even aside from payload.
You want to know what would allow for that without degrading the experience of either premium players or tech tree players? An early variant specifically to have the limited AAM capacity. Which you could put your energy behind, instead of wanting to create a virtually unplayable experience in an uptier from 11.7 without all aspect AAMs facing 12.7 aircraft. You can argue all you want that it would be 11.3, but the flight model would not facilitate that. That is before we consider weaponry and defensive capacity.*
*I would also note, in your own words, you acknowledge that F1s would effectively seal club at a lower rating with: “It could be a beast at 11.3 or 11.7”
Explaining why you’re wrong is not casting aside. Screaming into the aether that your opposition knows very little and you’re the only one with knowledge is.
Nope.
Some of the F1 Cs were converted into C 200s (about half of the fleet I think) but both aircraft were in service at the same time and were withdrawn from service at the same time, it is normal that they have the same armament
2 Likes
No, those are definitely your words suggesting exactly what I presented.
1 Like
You completely ignored all my points about why the speed is good
2 Likes
But you do not explain why.
In game there is barely a difference between the 3 versions.
Unfortunately the French F.1C-200 ended up being a premium instead of a Spanish or Iraqi one but that simply is the situation.
Let alone the fact that what can outrun you can’t out turn you. I suspect this individual is unfamiliar with BnZ and interceptor playstyles.
1 Like
How so?
You are ignoring everything everything but speed as far as I can tell.
BUT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. The F1 CT is not at all the same aircraft as the C or the C 200
Really now?
I have explained why, but you don’t want to hear it, so you don’t comprehend it. I am sure these other lovely individuals could point to my explanations and you would still beseech the void to say it isn’t so.
As far as air to air is concerned it pretty much is.
Personally I would have prefered to have C in a early configuration, with CT and C-200 being the later tech tree variants with a Iraqi or Spanish variant as a premium.
But in this case, why wouldn’t we remove the weapon from the F15E? It also has the same air-to-air weapons as an F15C.
I’m am pretty sure I disarmed the arguments you brought forward only to be answered with nothing but empty phrases.
That situation is not comparable at all.
“Empty phrases” is a funny way to respond to critique highlighting that you choose not to engage with arguments that do not support your position.
Alternatively: We should just remove the A10 early and A10 late because those designations mean effectively nothing but a historical distinction on payload, and according to this individual we can’t have that.
1 Like