Yeah, they shouldn’t have them either
I don’t see the problem its like B29 the RAF had B-29s during the cold War, under a different name as Washington’s. Licence to be built under a nation that has ordered them.
Germany has the F-18 but under Switzerland, Iran has the F-14 but under USA, and still US were buying Harriers from the UK. The F-111 was cancelled by the MOD but were ordered by Australia and still in game we have the F-111.
It’s like for example the German Me-264 that never saw bombing runs because it was only the 1 prototype long range bomber. Warthunder should have added the Ju-290 instead that was frequently used more times during WW2.
No it isn’t because UK never made them, or tested them, or operated them. There are no grounds for it’s addition to the UK other than a passing thought by someone in UK MoD
What is up with Brit mains trying to steal American equipment every chance they get. And when Gaijin makes the correct decision, like with the M1A1 AIM, then it gets whined about
5 Likes
Huh I’m confused do you mean to talk about the f15?
And Leopard2A4M.
2 Likes
Not sure what the purpose of this thread is. I already have a suggestion for the F-14D open in this forum. If you’re looking for an answer to the question ‘Should the F-14D be added?’, you can check out and see the poll here:
1 Like