Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

If by that you mean that it should have and not that it was planned to, yes, I agree.

J-15T has officially entered PLANAF service, first clear photos of them operating from the carriers.



6 Likes

The scanned photos really have a feel similar to mid-Cold War photography. I would not be surprised if you took this photo to the Soviet Union and said it was taken on the Ulyanovsk. This reminds me of the scene in Neon Genesis Evangelion where the Su-33 is on an American aircraft carrier.

1 Like

Yeah, that’s because it’s from a magazine, so the photos look old.

1 Like

How come the irst is not clear?

IRST use IR as its name suggests, and some materials like rare earth ceramics despite not being transparent to visible light is transparent to IR radiation. They are often actually better than transparent material thus why newer IR missiles also use this.

1 Like

This IRST can be seen on J-10B, J-10C, J-16, and now J-15T.
Curiously, J-11BG doesn’t seem to use it.

I only remember Asuka in that picture, haha.

1 Like

@141_allen it turns 180° back to protect it’s lens.

Really? I have never seen it turned around though.

it will turn in sky, clearly there isn’t many photos shot in sky

Apologies for the low quality

it’s taking off or landing, close to ground, so it turn off in advance.
“in sky” means flying stably
for example, this J-16 Irst, and sometimes, it also turn on when being checked in ground



image

image

It can be turned around at any point as the pilot so wishes

1 Like

yes, but the normal procedure is turn it on later

1 Like

So its clear?

image

Some models yes

Other models yes but slightly obscured due to usage of rare earth minerals such as Yttrium and Zirconium in a composite with Magnesium Fluoride.

When it is not clear in any way that means it is rotated to be hidden

1 Like

it’s coating film that reflects unwanted lights.
rare-earth material is totally different, and Magnesium Fluoride is clearly not rare-earth, not rare at all

There’s nothing wrong with 6+4. The EFT is 6+2, the Rafale is 8+0 or 6+2, the F-15C/E/I are 4/8+4/0, etc… 6+4 is already above average.

Yeah, I agree, but I often think PL12s are just less efficient than AMRAAMs and that sort of means more missiles are needed. Also 96 CMs are not the best, and unless domestic engines are brought in, I would really make it a F15C counterpart rather than F15E or EFT.