Gaijin just thinks PL12AE = PL12A is enough.
2 Likes
Yeah cause if chinas naming scheme would be consistent it would mean the PL-12A is the inservice designation
1 Like
Reading all the cope in this chat gives second hand embarrassment holy hell
1 Like
atleast they removed the “E” from the missile designation
Gaijin has been failing to do that for some radras
like the Irbis-E or the Zhuk-AE
1 Like
The E lowkey would be more accurate in this case lmao
1 Like
you know what makes it better
they dont have the E in their file names, so it is just N035 and N010A
1 Like
Then what‘s the difference between PL-12A and PL12AE? Just export version or they have something really different
It is not known what the PL-12A actually is
the PL-12A ingame is the PL-12AE
if we go via china´s very (not) reliable naming scheme it is the inservice version, issue is that a missile similar to the PL-12AE was never spotted on chinese fighters
As such the PL-12A designation is a very grey one, as it might be what it is ingame or just not exist at all
1 Like
Kind of like something between PL12 and PL15 for export purposes?
I guess
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/C51ZVN1LKFfO
The report got accepted. Will the J-16 get a better VNE?
J-16 reduced RCS report anyone?
jk, gaijin doesnt care
8 Likes
Question why don’t they use the KLJ10A? i know that the J-16 likely doesn’t use the KLJ10A, but it also likey doesn’t use the KLJ7A. So why not use the better radar?
Also does the J-16 have a built-in thermal camera that can be used to designate targets like the mig-29?
Its uses a renamed KLJ-10A cause the vertical coverage is slightly differently arranged the the other ones
1 Like
Doens’t the KLJ-10A have more azimuth?
No literally the same
Oh
What are those yellow side panels?
sidelooking Aesa apertures, and no this radar has no relation to the J-series of planes at all par the JF-17
2 Likes
but what about the KLJ-10A?