Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

Its fine as it is ingame

So no cool radar?
image

No

1 Like

yes

1 Like

The KLJ-10A/16 is perfectly fine for literally most situations

Is it different from the J-15T?

No only vertical is differently arranged 70‐+ instead of -50+90

2 Likes

No all 3 have the same radar with the J-10C having different vertical scanning area due to being mounted at an angle. 15T should also be angled but i cant remember if gaijin made it so. The 3d model in X-ray isnt angled anyways

1 Like

Does anyone know?

No there is like nothing known about chinese Irst’s

1 Like

Btw would be cool if we got these two implemented
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/F2nzNbB5Kkym
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hozPuCBw7ZDP

Dont like most missiles / bombs have a minimum launch speed? Pretty sure those just aren’t modeled in game

Shh just make the motor die at low speed or smth idc

I just want my mach 3.5 cruise

if they get accepted you should be able to report the same thing on the kh-31 family

This has already been implemented for the Kh-31.

Psure the KH-31 used to die at lowspeed but then they omega buffed its booster

it was accurately modeled for the kh-31a/p, under ~650km/h launches @ 100m would result in the ramjet not having enough airflow to speed up the missile anymore, on the kh-31ad/pd this minimum speed has always been lower than 650km/h, after some buffs to the solid motor the kh-31a/p can still speed up even when fired from ~500km/h @ 100m, and the ad/pd variants can still speed up even when fired from 300km/h @ 100m. 650km/h is the minimum launch speed given on brochures for both versions of the missile

Tbh i just wanna make the cm102 bad since i cant get the cruise speed :)

1 Like

i fw that lol

And with the mach 2 release they cant even claim stupid release conditions lol