no the one that was announced in a dev blog
wiki says it but iirc the wingtip pylons dont support it physically
Both J-15T and J-16 are only wired for PL-10 for short range missiles. To the point where when you actually put on PL-8B on them in game they magically add an incompatible pylon for PL-8.
4 Likes
of course, but in war thunder gaijin will have the final say in how they want the missile to perform. Not to mention none of the pl-12 series missiles can pull 38gs as well in game, if pl-15 performs just like pl-12 does in game, I think many people wont be very happy with this.
okay thanks
Paper specs never translate into in-game performance. After the changes, you can no longer see overloads above 30G from the PL-12. The PL-15 has smaller fin area, so in the game, I have every reason to suspect the PL-15’s maneuverability will only be worse than the PL-12’s.
Ah okay. So it’s a Rafale situation here.
1 Like
Well yeah you dont have to tell me.
The finAoA shit is stupid anyway, otherwise some of the modern missiles shouldnt be able to pull at all what they can
just pull 12gs guys
FM might change, Avionics unlikely
2 Likes
lmao
1 Like
There has to be a way for China to reveal at least some information about shenyang flanker avionics to stop us from getting placeholder radars.
1 Like
Hype
¯_(ツ)_/¯
So except empty mass (I hope that also changes) its slightly lighter - just need to get the engines changed to WS-10B Series 3 somehow though.
5 Likes
thats not bad quite a nice bit of LS6 with with 88s and ld10s
New engines that suspiciously underperforms compared to the AL-41 /s
1 Like
you mean engines that dont fit the 3D model
I hope it does, but I highly doubt it.
The J-16 like shown on the stream still doesn’t really feel like a true 14.7 jet.
Ah right, IIRC B-3 is TVC, no?