The employee said: You need to provide the following information about the source:
Title and if applicable: publication date, document number, ISBN;
Author or organisation;
Image of the cover;
Images of all the referenced pages and their page numbers;
References for photographs;
as far as i’ve seen the bug report has only one “usable” source for the bug itself and needs another one to confirm it, so if you have any sources that can help in that regard it would be perfect.
I’ve got 2 books coming in the mail later this week/2 weeks out; Modern Chinese Military Aircraft 1990-Present & Chinese Air Power: Current Organisation and Aircraft of all Chinese Air Forces. Hopefully they will have some additional information that can be used.
If i’m not mistaken the first three images show a missile between the air intakes that is supposed to be (by other people) a r27 training round. I’m totally clueless on this topic tbf.
no such things, the closest one is J-16, which is fully capable of using large amount of guided weapons. But SU-34 is too special, it sacrifices some air to air ability to do CAS, parallel cockpit, cockpit armor, etc.
Yeah it seems that the sources aren’t specific enough, on the report the employee said: Sources have been verified. All but the presentation do not even mention the name RWR.
The only source with the name is a photo of the presentation with no attribution, and it is unclear whether the RWR is installed on the J-11A or not. It is not clear how it should differ from the SPO-15.
If there are other sources indicating the characteristics RLK 207C/D and installation of the RWR on the J-11A, create a new report