Does anyone have more detailed images of the YJ-83K being used with the newly introduced bulky DF-4 pylon (which is present for YJ-91, and KD-88’s)?
Even after increasing the weight to 234 kg, the LD-10 outperforms the AGM-88 at a distance of up to 10 km
Looks interesting for TRB
Did they fix the damage tho? Cause as far as I remember it’s only really good for tickling the poor SPAAs
the LD-10 is fixed now yes
Probably because the LD-10 (based on the PL-12) has better overall thrust during its 7.5-second boost phase compared to the AGM-88, even though the LD-10 is heavier. I checked the missile stat sheet — the AGM-88’s first and second stage thrust are both lower than the LD-10’s. So yeah, the AGM-88 accelerates worse than the LD-10.
Yeah, the laser proximity fuze has been removed. They can now properly engage ground targets. And the damage looks pretty solid.
does someone wanna ask smin or something about the YJ-91 broad band seeker bug reports?
The issue manager does think the YJ-91’s seeker is not a bug ? They probably just think the YJ-91 is a Chinese copy of the Kh-31P.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/MNPtvhBDON4C
i mean precisely so that we dont have to write a suggestion for it eg get the bugreport forwarded as a suggestion
Do we just ping Smin here to see the messages or what then? Would be nice to see YJ-91 with wideband seeker so I don’t have to choose between like 3 different versions of it on my top tier jet, as far as that one report seems to make it out they do believe in the wideband seeker YJ-91 but don’t want to make it into a thing for some reason?
@Yamahagi Someone just sent me this saying it’s a realistic J-16 loadout, but it seems a little suspicious, do you have any comment on it?
Personally, considering we’ve already seen live dual PL-15 pylons on J-20s as well as AVIC J-10CE demonstrator, I wouldn’t consider it as unlikely, but a little too overdone - afterall, we also have these on J-15T now.
This loadout will be accepted if the plane is Russia one
Stop doing the victim.
They already accept it for j15T double pylon that dont even exist unlike the russia one
Yo, can someone recognise on which flanker this was taken

Max is 4 dual pylon I think, 18 Pl-15 is too much
still pretty intresting)






