Pretty sure it’s an MKK
2 Likes
man why couldn’t the chinese keep the r-27er on their flankers, it is such a good missile even with fox 3s existing.
I would deadass still bring at least 1 27er on the j-16 if it still had it over stuff like the pl-15, stealth launches + datalink reconnect is just so good
you will get them when the plaf su30mk2 and su35
come to the game
1 Like
Them pay walking the su-30 is such a scummy thing to do, hopefully we get su-30mk2 in tech tree eventually
soon, hope they dont skip the J-series flanker
1 Like
My biggest turn off is the loosing R27ET-R-73 combo.
Pl-8B doesnt cut it and lacking long range IR missile is drawback in my book.
1 Like
irl, R-27ER has many problems and is all way worse than common ARH, and the inventory is almost depleted, no need to keep it, even they can use, you won’t see it, since the inventory is in hand of old SU-27/J-11 squad’s hand.
it’s many years since last time R-27 series is seen, inventory should be none.
hope gaijin can add PL-11AE.
5 Likes
The Su-35 does not use the 27er, according to the brochure
Only R-27P1/EP1 (passive seeker) = 27T/ET
su-35 definitely carries r-27er, here it is on su-35. Also r-27p is completely different compared to standard r-27r/t.
What exactly? A new seeker?
It’s better to show the original
So, 27P is a better SARH missile?
R-27P is not sarh. it is a passive radar seekerhead.
Basically, it targets enemies radar emition, like a HARM missile or kh-31p.
I’ve never heard of it before.
It’s an interesting rocket
1 Like
If the reason of technical compatibility had not appeared in the game from the beginning, I would also oppose it, as you said it would lead to some very absurd situations like the current MKMKH38. But the problem now is that other TTs have already obtained more mounts based on this reason, and I cannot accept China TT giving up this right
these look like brand new, wonder if they got liecense to build them ( i dont think so )
no.
Are u sure of the translations cause a load of translators do the thing where R/P are translated wrongly due to Russian-English alphabet. Previously it isaid P-27 as well. Not saying it is necessarily wrong but it was P-27P, which would either mean P-27P or R-27R.
no, there is a R-27P, as said, passive radar seeker, as a SEAD missile