a quick check of pylons.
PF8 wing tip and PF8 under wing for PL-8/10, PF12 for PL-12
PF10K wing tip and PF10X under wing for PL-10 only
PF10W under wing for PL-10/12/15
PFT12 for PL-12
PF15 for PL-15
PFT15 for PL-15
PF10K wing tip and PF10X under wing for PL-10 only
PF10W under wing for PL-10/12/15
PFT12 for PL-12
PF15 for PL-15
PFT15 for PL-15
2 Likes
Just saying we are not guaranteed that these are PL12/15.
shi has a higher guidance delay than the damn r-37m🥀
Let’s not mention the SPICE of MKM, KH38 or EF2000 for now. So, what do you think of SU27SM and SU30, both of which are dual Pylons? These are added based on technical feasibility without any physical photos. The AGM65 of F15E has never been used by the Strike Eagle in real life. There is also the F15A IR Flare. Laser BRINSTONE from Tornado, Germany. And the SU30SM2, which has both AL41F and N035 radars, some of these aircraft are mounted or configured based on technical feasibility speculation, while others are completely fictional. Do you not object to all of these and only oppose the insignificant dual pyrons of the J11/16/15 series? That’s really interesting
1 Like
How absurd, things that don’t follow official documents or photos are everywhere in this game, yet you turn a blind eye and only nitpick a small part of them
Let me preface by saying I only play china, I dont care or know to much about any other nation.
EF has been exhibited with spice 250 not sure what you mean by that one.
Spoiler
KH-38 in the manufacturers brochures specifically mentioned SU-30’s as a launch platform
They have the same pylons and launchers.
I dont personally think they should have them but I dont really care that much since I dont play or use them.
To follow this i dont think the PLAAF SU-35 should get KH-38’s when its added as its not something China has ever fielded or tested.
Im also unsure what you mean by this, the Tornado can use Brimstones and they have a SAL only mode.
I haven’t seen any proof of these ever being used so I dont think they should be a thing.
I hold all nations to the same standards but I dont play them so I dont bother with them and their inaccuracies
This is your contradiction. I have never denied the technical feasibility of using SPICE for EF2000, but obviously not all countries to which EF2000 belongs in the game have purchased SPICE. As for the Su-35, it’s even more ridiculous. You kept saying that the KH38 is compatible with the KH29 hanger, so it’s reasonable to provide the KH38 for MKM. But without being equipped and tested, the KH38 of the Chinese SU35 has become inappropriate again. To be honest, you made me laugh
Did you miss the part where I said i personally dont think the MKM should have it?
If a nation hasn’t purchased or used x thing they shouldn’t have it. Simple
1 Like
Okay, so do you think China should give up this right while other TTs can obtain powerful ammunition on the grounds of technical feasibility? Forgive me for not agreeing
As I said if x nation haven’t used x munition it shouldn’t get it based on technical feasibility.
If GAIJIN strictly abides by this rule, then I also agree, because it will make vehicles from different countries lose their differentiation. However, the reality is that GAIJIN has not followed your rules. Whether it is the SPICE of EF2000 or the KH38 of MKM, as long as it has technical feasibility in foreign trade weapons, GAIJIN does not care whether it has been purchased and equipped in reality. So why should I oppose, especially the KH38 of SU35?
You dont need to oppose anything. You’re entitled to your own opinions.
I only pointed out my opinion, which at the end of the day doesn’t matter as I don’t make the rules.
Thats up to Gaijin
1 Like
We seem to have digressed and returned to the topic of dual Pylons. Since GAIJIN has equipped the Su30 and SU27SM with dual Pylons that only the SU35 has equipped them with, why should we give up the right to fight for the dual Pylons of J10/20 for J11/16/15
2 Likes
While I dont think either platform should have dual pylons since they haven’t been seen equipped with them.
I think they’re quite different since comparing a SU-35 and a SU-27 is completely different than comparing a J-10 to a J-16. Its quite literally comparing apples to oranges
Su-35 is explicitly compatible with kh38s. They are the missiles under the intakes
1 Like
I know they’re compatible. But as I said I dont think nations should get weapons based of technical feasibility but instead of what they purchased and use
1 Like
also red kh38s are NOT fake
its not just compatible, it uses them. theres no mental gymnastics about it as it actually uses them unlike other platforms in game.
You may say that the SU27SM/30/35 are both FLANKER, so they can be equipped with the same hanger. But in reality, they only have similar appearances. The body structure of SU35 has been modified to have stronger structural strength. If SU27SM can carry dual Pylons, then J11/16/15 can also carry them in hardware. However, in software that cannot be distinguished by appearance, what evidence do you have to prove that the difference between J11/16/15 and J10/20 is greater than that between SU27SM/30 and SU35
1 Like
Im talking about the Chinese SU-35. PLAAF has never purchased or tested the KH-38 AFAIK, so it shouldn’t have them. There’s no mental gymnastics its purely based on what X nation uses or has acquired
1 Like