Fins are exactly the same
you must be blind i guess
Once again, not gonna bother with your nonsense russian bias kind of stuff.
And the img of the engines is funny since 1. the J16 has WS-10B, and is lighter so the thrust to weight is better than what you’ve shown.
7 Likes
These are the antennas
Hopefully we get to see the J10A soon, really looking forward to it.
1 Like
yes, no different
7 Likes
Seriously? Hope you’re really dont know what website you use as source…
1 Like
Just discovered that this is a cult media…
1 Like
Imo its not entirety unlikely for us to get Early J-10, without the full list of armament, so, J-10 with PL-8 and PL-12
But thats the exact same for J-11B
source?
J-20 has used either AL-31FN, AL-31FN Serie III, WS-10C/B, and WS-15
WS-10C has ~142 kN of thrust.
WS-10B has ~139 kN of thrust.
I think that chart may be wrong because AL-31FN has 124.54 kN thrust
Serie 3 has 134.35 kN thrust
1 Like
This is an ending that can be made of any shape, It’s a pity that you’re stupid and don’t understand
1 Like
I dont think the look of the aircraft really even matters, idk why you guys are arguing about it.
J-16 is designed off of Su-30MK2 anyway
1 Like
Are you stupid?
Do you not see the top of the fins are different?
4 Likes
I assume Su-30MKK it’s export if Su-30M2 with domestic russian engine, avionics, radar and armament.
Shenyang J-16 with domestic chinese avionics, radar, armament and engine. but J-16 similar to F-15EX Eagle II
No, because the Su-30M2 appeared later
Nobody is talking about the antennas you clown.
@BBCRF LOOK at the top of the tail fins
Excuse me for my aggression but I have about had it with you and your delusions about the J-16
6 Likes
This is an antenna, it has nothing to do with the power set of the structure.
1 Like