i’ve literally mentioned the top fins that are part of the airframe and are different, i’ll stop replying to your nonsense since i’m wasting time answering you instead of playing helldivers lol.
1 Like
Al-31F 1530/122.58=0.0124 WS-10 1795/135=0.0132
1 Like
Fins are exactly the same
you must be blind i guess
Once again, not gonna bother with your nonsense russian bias kind of stuff.
And the img of the engines is funny since 1. the J16 has WS-10B, and is lighter so the thrust to weight is better than what you’ve shown.
6 Likes
These are the antennas
Hopefully we get to see the J10A soon, really looking forward to it.
1 Like
yes, no different
6 Likes
Seriously? Hope you’re really dont know what website you use as source…
1 Like
Just discovered that this is a cult media…
1 Like
Imo its not entirety unlikely for us to get Early J-10, without the full list of armament, so, J-10 with PL-8 and PL-12
But thats the exact same for J-11B
source?
J-20 has used either AL-31FN, AL-31FN Serie III, WS-10C/B, and WS-15
WS-10C has ~142 kN of thrust.
WS-10B has ~139 kN of thrust.
I think that chart may be wrong because AL-31FN has 124.54 kN thrust
Serie 3 has 134.35 kN thrust
1 Like
This is an ending that can be made of any shape, It’s a pity that you’re stupid and don’t understand
1 Like
I dont think the look of the aircraft really even matters, idk why you guys are arguing about it.
J-16 is designed off of Su-30MK2 anyway
1 Like
Are you stupid?
Do you not see the top of the fins are different?
4 Likes
I assume Su-30MKK it’s export if Su-30M2 with domestic russian engine, avionics, radar and armament.
Shenyang J-16 with domestic chinese avionics, radar, armament and engine. but J-16 similar to F-15EX Eagle II
No, because the Su-30M2 appeared later
Nobody is talking about the antennas you clown.