*Su-30SM DCS mod
1 Like
Technically yes, since the J-11 was a Su-27 kit. He may very well have worked on identical airframes. Owing to that knowledge, he has pointed out that they have made virtually no changes to the underlying structure and core of the airframe.
I believe the word of someone who helps build the aircraft over a keyboard warrior discounting his knowledge. He has pointed out (and provided photos of) the J-11 and Su-27’s frames being near identical with only minor modifications (that usually add weight) to fix Chinese replacements for some of the no longer produced parts of older Flankers.
Similarly, Iran had to develop their own parts for the F-14’s for example. Many of the hydraulics needed domestic replacements.
Mb gang
1 Like
At least we have published secondary sources saying it’s 700kg reduction over the baseline J-11, over MIG_23M’s words from another guy who allegedly worked on the Russian airframes.
Ordnance Industry Science & Technology (兵工科技), 2021 Issue 10, J-10C & J-16 Special Issue.
Tech Trends (科技风), 2007 Issue 10.
7 Likes
They claim the empty weight is 15 tons, or am I misreading this?
Sure, let us reduce the empty weight of the J-11B to 15 tons per this highly reputable source… let us ignore the fact that photos kind of debunk some of these claims…
3 Likes
“15-ton class/15吨级” means anything between 15 to 16 tons, there are two published sources claming 700kg reduction while the Su-27 is 16300kg.
It makes no sense that it would be claimed as 15 ton class if it barely falls under 16 tons completely empty airframe. That is highly dubious. It states clearly that there were attempts to lower RCS with radar absorbent materials and additive paint. These drastically increase the weight of an airframe as seen on J-10C and other aircraft.
It looks to me that they claim improvement in all areas and there is no reasonable evidence to support the information. There are no pictures, no real source.
1 Like
Meanwhile you don’t have anything other than “words from a guy who worked on Sukhois” and “look at the pictures”. Show me a textbook page where they state radar absorbent materials are heavier.
You also talk like materials are the only factor involving weight while completely ignored J-11B had the whole radar and avionics package swapped*.
*Shipborne Weapons (舰载武器), 入室登堂——歼-11的性能升级, 2015 Issue 6.
6 Likes
the weight increase on J-10C is mainly because the addition of electronic devices including EW devices. some sources suggest that J-10C is the PLA’s best nonspecialized EW 4th gen plane.
7 Likes
You mean… like… any actual scientific paper on radar absorbent materials available online? They are always heavier than the lighter composites that could be used instead due to the need to use, well, radar absorbent materials instead of the optimal ones for weight and strength.
There is no evidence to support that the modern Russian avionics aren’t equally lighter in weight and yet their weight still went up… Unless China has magic materials that somehow cost less and weigh less than the Russian ones while simultaneously offering the same level of radar absorbing capacity…
I don’t think that is true because the weight of the J-10B and other airframes without this was also equally heavier.
2 Likes
Speaking of, do we even have a Weight for j10b? We know weight of j10ce from Pakistani brochure and there is conflicting information on j10a empty weight (different sources give around a 500 kg range), but I don’t think there’s any info on j10b weight. To me it seems j10b and c weight should essentially be the same due to them being essentially the same air frame
Not permissible for sharing on the forum
1 Like
Regarding weight increases from J-10A to B/C variants: the J-10A was never as light as sometimes claimed, with its actual empty weight likely between 8,500-8,800 kg rather than the 8,300 kg shown in-game. Meanwhile, the final production model J-10B achieved internal integration of ECM pods (evidenced by prototype 01 photos showing external ECM equipment during early testing), while the J-10C features an enlarged radome housing additional liquid cooling systems for its AESA radar.
As for the J-11B, its failure to reach the projected 15.xx-ton empty weight—despite electronic upgrades and structural weight reduction—is largely attributable to internalizing the wingtip ECM pods previously carried externally on Su-27SKs, explaining why J-11Bs never display wingtip pods. Subsequent upgrades later introduced newer ECM systems mounted on underwing pylon stations.
4 Likes
So we’re going to pretend ECM systems are responsible for the weight gain. Absurd. The J-10B and C are nearly 1 ton heavier. Who ever heard of 1 ton of ECM equipment?
Even the E/A-18G dedicated EW variant of the Super Hornet is only around 500kg heavier than the original. Is China that far behind in electronic warfare equipment that it must take up twice the amount of weight?
4 Likes
What’s difference between su30mkk and mk2, just the radar?
The J-10B/C have strengthened wing structures aswell considering the B/C can carry YJ-91’s and KD-88’s unlike the 10A
1 Like
It is heavier, but it has lost its gun, which weighs about 400 kg. So… 900kg on ECM equipment?
5 Likes
you also forgot this, big AESA radar with liquid cooling system, which is also much heavier than mechanical radar
3 Likes
Radar and Kh-31A addition