Also, does the J-16 get the same amount of countermeasures as the su30 at 98?
Looks like the 96 usually found on most flankers, at least from what i’m seeing from pics we have of the J16’s top. And considering it is based off of the J11BS then yeah it likely shares that in common with it.
What’s wrong with the j11b’s radar? It can’t scan anything in the game. Even the j8f’s radar is better than it
1 Like
Gaijin happened
1 Like
I made some bug reports for the j-11bs radar
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eoZl2w4evaoy
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LRkP1x4kwtmn
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AcSSoqiIILeF
6 Likes
I have a feeling third one gonna be rejected. “Basic logic” wouldn’t cut for them, especially without some docs/studies/official statements to back it up
ill remove that bit lol
it’s not official. though no technical problem
2 Likes
Maybe in Ace Combat whenever they remember that China exists
4 Likes
We’ll be lucky to even get 10 pl-15s honestly
It should be fine, we have the 10 “large” hard points
And 2 “small” ones for just PL-10s
10+2 isn’t bad at all
2 Likes
Wonder if PLAAF ever tested their double racks on Flankers (probably overkill, but I wouldn’t mind more missiles on later J-16s and J-15s)
They haven’t as far as I know, but they have put them on the j20 which is pretty funny
I mean, it’s not completely out of the question I guess.
Only Su-35 has the ability to carry 12x R-77s but ingame we have it on the Su-30SM, Gaijin has sorta set the precedent for ahistorical loadouts.
no, but I think there is no technical problem of using this.
1 Like
Isnt this J-10B/C photo that shows additional missiles under belly?
it’s J-10CE
1 Like
Whats the difference between C and CE?
CE has one less set of antenna on the back resulting in a lot of people mistaking it as J10B, but otherwise nothing as far as I know in terms of equipment. Maybe it can use NATO weapons or sth like that for Pakistan and now Egypt.
1 Like