You can always just search on ROE website how exported stuff is called
1 Like
Only 60km radar range because they somehow got the bright idea to ship this update with literally unfinished slop, but sure otherwise it stomps all over basically every other 13.7
3 Likes
so J-11B’s radar only have 60 km and 6+4 loadout only??? wtf gaijin
Did pl-8b get upgraded boosters? I don’t feel there is much difference between pl-8 and pl-8b.
Sadly not :(
1 Like
What’s the supposed upgrade then??? The irccm???
I think so, yea. Hopefully it will be changed in the future
1 Like
If that was the upgrade, why did they not give it to J-10A when it was out? I know they don’t care about China, but this is so lazy.
1 Like
No booster upgrade, but it gets a 3 degree fov seeker, which is the second narrowest among top tier IRCCM missiles and only behind the magic 2, so on that front it is very much superior to most missiles for pre-flare resistance
In game it is limited to 3.5 mach.
Chinese Use IRBIS-E a export variant of IRBIS. on SU-35s Main difference betwen both its that IRBIS-E work with less KW. I don’t remember how much was the Diff. But something in the line of 10kw for IRBIS-E and 20kw for IRBIS.
I don’t think PLA using NATO names…
AFAIK they just use Su-35
Radar tracking range of the 1493 is limited to only 60km rn…
I don’t think that’s correct but unfortunately not much sources available to dispute it.
1 Like
also look down have limited to 40 deg…
and ACM have only vertical scan, no boresight mode
HMS mode is as bad as APG-70 as it’s exactly a c&p APG-70 with some differences
its radar modes are still placeholder from N001, this limits its range and scan speed.
1 Like
Gaijin and their incompetence has no limits, the implementation of the J-11B in-game is a utter joke and whatever curse put on the J-11A has been clearly passed down. This slop called the “Hornet’s Sting” update clearly favours the one with the larger wallet, the F/A-18C Early in-game and its implementation is near perfect (minus the APG-65 bug) whilst the J-11B is a rushed mess.
The PL-8B is a carbon copy of the PL-8 minus the seeker of a R-73, the PL-12 still wobbles like crazy at longer ranges iirc, the MAWS on the J-11B is incorrectly represented in-game as the S740, the same one found on the J-11A and the cockpit translations is straight up comedic.
Gaijin swears to historical accuracy yet they clearly go down the ahistorical route whenever it comes to something Chinese, next whenever we do see the J-16 they’ll somehow manage to convince us that it doesn’t in fact have an AESA radar but the same old N001 found on the base SU-27.
The J-11B should’ve honestly been introduced at the same time as the F-15C MSIP, we should’ve gotten the J-11B Block 09 alongside the Eurofighters and the J-16 Early to match the SU-30SM. Furthermore, if Gaijin is willing to weaken missiles and their IRCCM for balance purposes like the PL-8B, we could’ve easily seen the PL-10 this update.
After seeing the Chinese community unite to fix the VT-5 and nothing change, my hope for China as a whole in WT is almost entirely gone - rant over
7 Likes
Yes I’m aware, it’s just called Su-35, just added the Flanker-M there additionally
Realy? Isnt seeker pl-8b from PL-5Ell and pl-9c? Why R-73?
The seeker of the PL-8B is modeled off the R-73 one in WT
Yes, I do agree that Su-30SM and J-11B were not even comparable in the first place, J-11B started serial production in 2006 while Su-30SM was introduced in 2013, that’s a pretty big gap.
Gaijin originally thought that this was the 14.0 that China could receive but even then they found out it wasn’t enough.
I think that Gaijin should have gave us J-11BG instead but limited the armament to PL-12 + PL-8B.
4 Likes