Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

J-8F yes, but the J-10A would just be a worse J-10B if given PL-8B, although it is ahistorical the PL-5EII allows it to be more unique

Has anyone already created a claim or a proposal for the J-8F to receive legitimate missiles?

I don’t believe so, there’s more than sufficient evidence though

Well, guys, I’m skipping the j-11b unfortunately. As usual, it was added at the wrong time, when it was no longer needed at all. I’ll be waiting for the J-11BG or J-11D, with AESA or some kind of su30mkk with a cool CAS . And in the next update, they will most likely give us a J-10B with PESA or AESA and it will be many times better than this one.

Imma go for the J-11B because Sino-Flankers are hot

2 Likes

I made a bug report for the HUD symbology being incorrect Community Bug Reporting System

We need jf-17 block 3.

The J-11B has been given guided A2G weaponry. Would that mean there would be no need for the Su-30MKK to be added?

Well, the su30mkk should have more A2G missile, and they will be better in quality. As it is, it’s not really needed anymore.

I just hope they add something underneath the JH-7A.

The A2G C-704 missiles were found in datamines if they are added during this update the JH7A, J10A and JF-17 for firing them
image

I don’t know if I missed an episode or if the decal is just new but could it be a first teaser of J15??

4 Likes

I don’t know, the j-15 won’t be very playable with 24 CMs. We need J-11BG or J-11D, J-10B or JF-17 block3

1 Like

It’s not a problem for me anyway, staying close to the ground and the missiles hit next to it even with planes that have more than 100 flares I do it, the chaff are not 100% reliable so a j15 with only 24 cm doesn’t bother me and it will always make an extra plane in the tree

it’s old one

48 actually, like the Su-33, but even worse because it’d probably be at battle rating 13.3 since it gets PL-12s.

There’s no hard evidence of an onboard ECM suite either, but there is a rear-facing radome in place of the drogue chute of normal Flankers, which very likely houses some sort of ECM system; The question now is whether or not Gaijin has plans to implement ECM systems in the future - The Su-33 and Su-34 actually have their ECM pods modelled in the files, but they were never implemented.


the lack of hinges (as seen on normal Flankers, since it is the drogue chute door for them) and the fact that it is painted in the same material as the front radome suggests that it’s some sort of rear-facing radar or ecm system.

Is j11b maws all aspect?

1 Like

Currently its copied from the J-11A so its 360 but the J-11B only has the rear facing sensors so it should only detect them in the rear. Doubt that would get fixed tho

more like at least 13.7, F-16A OCU is at 13.7 with less missiles worse radar and no HMD