I think they’ve just given it the one from the j-8b, crazy how they put all this effort into giving the f-18 and su-30 their full accurate fancy huds and just slap a copy-paste onto the j-11, although it’s not too different so I shant complain too much
late production j15s did get ws10bs (by late i mean literally 2022) so it could be added
The J-11B’s BR for Air Realistic/ Simulator has also been lowered to 13.7
7 Likes
Would have been surprised if it didnt. Sure, it will be very good, but not 14.0 level good
Wonder if they gonna move J-11A down or just keep it the way it is rn
1 Like
J-11A sufferbus time
My beloved, was hoping to get J10B with this uptade but gaijin decided to gave us another flanker.
3 Likes
Do you mean the J-10B?
Oh yes my bad.
Best flanker in game currently, and gets a BR buff
Amazing
Has anyone made a bug report on the J-11B HUD tint yet?
I’m finding it hard to locate images online of the J-11B cockpit up close, and can only find some shots showing the tint from outside. There are also some very middling in quality J-15 cockpit shots showing the tint on what appears to be a near identical HUD, I could be wrong though.
J-11B - Tint visible from outside
J-11B - Current dev server
J-15 - Very blurry HUD glimpse
it’s flight performance is more close to F-15C, I guess it’s the reason.
I love flankers, but a J-10B would be pretty nice. Maybe they plan to add it in the summer update along with ESA for all the other nations that don’t have it yet.
1 Like
Made the report myself since I couldn’t see anyone else post about it, Hard to find reliable images so I used the best that I could get. Hopefully gets implemented before the update goes live. May not be extremely important to the aircraft but its still something that should be done.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jlrAM8150anE
@crunchyBoy it’s radar has some problem, not sure if it’s finished or placeholder, it’s range is too short, only about 50-60km
They were originally supposed to make the j-11BG with afar.
Well, if that’s the case, then all the more reason to give PL-8B for J-10A and J-8F
J-8F yes, but the J-10A would just be a worse J-10B if given PL-8B, although it is ahistorical the PL-5EII allows it to be more unique
Has anyone already created a claim or a proposal for the J-8F to receive legitimate missiles?