Empty weight reduced by 700kg, based off the Su-27SK, so 15600 is what it should be.
That bug will not likely pass, the true empty weight of the J-11B is not known and this is going off dubious sources and very likely erroneous conjecture.
Su-27SK is not 16300 kg, the Su-27S is 16300. The SK heavier than Su-27S
3 Likes
Isn’t j-11 exactly the same as 27 sk, just assembled in china?
I think so
The J11/A’s landing gear is reinforced and therefore weighs 300 kg more than the Su27Sk.
Isn’t SK the one with the reinforced landing gear though.
1 Like
Sorry for the photodump, but the J11B is filled with slop AI tier google translation garbage, and the fact that they literally stole someone’s photo and then somehow failed to reproduce even their watermark is only icing on top of the shit cake
In case you’re wondering what’s wrong, we have texts like “Earth”, “Nutritional Air To Ground Missile”, “Not Explode” , “Cheque”, “Emergency Throw Hood”, “Set Manual School Course”, “Magnetic School Course”, “Nutrition”, and “Sign (the verb as in signing your name)”
6 Likes
Regarding the photo with water mark issue I have written a report already, but the other part even if we can say this is not correct in terms of grammar, we have to provide so many images of high quality confirmed J11B cockpit. I am looking for them though.
1 Like
very wip
what are the big tube things?
Supposed to be for rockets I think.
Anyone know that since the j-11b gets the pl-8b, whether or not other aircraft will recieve it alongside its upgraded motor? For example, j8f, j10a off the top of my head.
They denied the report for it on J-10A and JH-7A, they said “we don’t add top tier missiles to low rank aircraft”
:\
I understand jh-7a? but j-10? low rank? lol
Any info on whether the J-11B can carry an 8+4 loadout or 8+2 loadout?
can you send me a screenshot of that report please :D
They changed the wording for it, now it is “relatively low BR aircraft”