my dislike for targo is not unfounded i see
But targo2 also can display the target position in soft lock, why it doesnt install in game
bc its missing symbology
like a lock box
but gaijin should just give the new chinese HMD to the J-16 and J-10
still hate the thing looks like shit
yeah at the end of the day its just a recolored JHMCS
well i asked smin if there are plans to change it
the awnser will probably be around the lines of “you have to make a bug report if you think that it is wrong”
The answer is: they swapped units to correct ones on placeholder so nothing in short term.
You don’t need to bother smin for obvious
wait, Why they can ignore the other mistakes if they fix one
What part of making a better placeholder because short term they don’t have new one coming is a “mistake”.
No, I tried it. I literally tried it in the modeling software, and from this angle, it can only be a twin rack — it’s not some optical illusion from another pylon.
8 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Mate, I feel like if you zoom out a bit more to reduce the perspective effect, it might match the silhouette better.But I feel like this is already pretty solid evidence.
1 Like
pls no
Btw when you exclude radar angles the KLj-10A and 16 are the best radars ingame iirc
If you take the F-117’s RCS characteristics as the target reference, the N035 currently delivers the best performance.
Trying to hang a twin rocket launcher?If they don’t overlap, I think you could use these images to create an issue
“Bugreports based on player guesses arent accepted”
1 Like
Nah, it’s not the regular Rocks — their twin racks are short, and even with the whole pylon setup, the missiles themselves don’t stick out past the outer leading edge of the wing. And it’s definitely not the S-130F either, those things are huge.
It is not a bug; the missiles could have been mounted on dual racks for transport from one airbase to another.