One thing that i get quite confused about is the radar topic. The radar can’t possibly be the N001 since it was the same radar that had to be modified on the su27sm to use fox3s… so either they don’t give us r77s and fox3s in general or they change the radar. It seems like an easy 1+1 kind of thing imo
1 Like
can this be used as source?
I believe it works as a secondary source, yes. But you need two secondary sources on something for devs to actually take it into consideration, more often than not.
1 Like
I think Gaijin needs two independent secondary sources, so 2 books from same author is likely to be rejected.
Hi, guys, this issue report gets a “acknowledge”. [DEV] J-11A Combined Avionics Bug Report // Gaijin.net // Issues
And in this report, the staff says duplicate and turn to the report above. J11A should have MAWS // Gaijin.net // Issues .
So, does it means all the things we can do now are waiting for gaijin to finish our J11A?
I am afraid the passed report only covers the MAWS. There are still reports for radars and RWR that are not passed yet.
Radar:
[DEV] J-11A Radar Bug Report. // Gaijin.net // Issues
RWR:
The RWR system of the j11A should be RLK 207C/D // Gaijin.net // Issues
Both need more resources or clarification on resources so the author needs to provide more stuff and somebody else can give more info if theres any
Hi guys good job all working hard on making sure thr J-11A gets properly polished.
If it is actually based on the 2015 product we should be pushing for all the upgrades and updates up to 2015.
If I can help anyone please give me a shout I would love to help!!
2 Likes
So… from what i’ve seen we need some work on two bug reports:
1 - Community Bug Reporting System “RWR”
The employee said: You need to provide the following information about the source:
Title and if applicable: publication date, document number, ISBN;
Author or organisation;
Image of the cover;
Images of all the referenced pages and their page numbers;
References for photographs;
So that requires some help i guess
2 - Community Bug Reporting System “RADAR”
as far as i’ve seen the bug report has only one “usable” source for the bug itself and needs another one to confirm it, so if you have any sources that can help in that regard it would be perfect.
4 Likes
I will look into it later and post here again.
Will mention you, thanks for sharing.
Working together like this is awesome :D
2 Likes
I’ve got 2 books coming in the mail later this week/2 weeks out; Modern Chinese Military Aircraft 1990-Present & Chinese Air Power: Current Organisation and Aircraft of all Chinese Air Forces. Hopefully they will have some additional information that can be used.
5 Likes
Linked the RWR report by wangkexhzijun in the combined reports RWR section.
From what I can see it likely has enough information to pass now, so it may just be the radar report missing 1 secondary source we have to tackle.
4 Likes
Yeah this is a bit tougher than expected.
Looking for info that originates from Chinese sources is extreme but glad progress is being made.
2 Likes
Any progression is good progression.
3 Likes
If i’m not mistaken the first three images show a missile between the air intakes that is supposed to be (by other people) a r27 training round. I’m totally clueless on this topic tbf.
R77 training round
1 Like
yeah, R77s. I also saw somebody talk about R27 bc of size issues but at this point im pretty sure its not a PL-12.
4th image does appear to be a Pl-12, same fin structure. The other images I agree that they are R-73 and R-77 training rounds