Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
1775

True, but at the same time this update seems to be centered around the canard-delta fighters, or fighters with canards in general like the Su-33

This update honestly should’ve been a carrier aircraft focused update with the exception of the Eurofighter and PzH 2000/Thai Sub Tree. The F/A-18, J-15, SU-33, Rafael and obviously the Eurofighter would’ve made for an amazing update.

We also should’ve gotten the SU-30MK2 over the J-11A whenever that was added with the option to switch between the R-73E or PL-8A, it would’ve been no better than the F-15C MSIP II but a balanced rival.

Gaijin has a tendency to overestimate Chinese vehicles and place them in a significantly higher BR than they actually should be and the best example is the ZTZ99A and J-11A.

1 Like
1776

current Flanker FM is bad, better T/W won’t help, but WS-10A’s better high altitude performance will make it a great bvr plane. from the chart, 2000N more than AL-31F in 11000m and 2Ma

1777

More thrust would always help a bit, considering the current Flanker loves to bleed speed.
And also the J-11B would be lighter, although it might not make too much difference it is still at the very least an improvement.

I’m not saying that this will make J-11B into an incredible dogfighter, but at least it would be notably better than what we currently have.

1 Like
1778

Both J10B and J11B are on the leak list, but only J10B has received an “unfinished” reply in these days, and J11B still has no news. I’m worried.

1779

I think maybe only J-10B will come.
J-11B might be delayed.

1780

Worst. Bad news after bad news, HQ-17 became a TOR-M1 replica, J-11B may be delayed, J-10B doesn’t know what’s wrong yet, and tomorrow the test server will be over. This version is not a good thing for Chinese players.

1781

I will still wait.
But it is ridiculous that they didn’t accept the reports on HQ-17.

1782

There was no response to HQ-17, everyone was only concerned about the sulfur of the typhoon, and HQ17 was forgotten.

1783

It seems like the report was denied, regarding the speed of the missile and the firing on the move.

1784

I am frustrated and disappointed that all reports of HQ-17 enhancements have been denied. Gaijin has been turning a blind eye to the facts.

1785

I’m used to it already.

ZTZ99A, VT-4A1
CAS ordnance for J-10A, JF-17, JH-7A.

Have seen “not a bug” for all of them, and a lot of times it is very unreasonable.

2 Likes
1786

Many Chinese players don’t use the site, and they just silently support options that strengthen China as voters. I can only do what I can. I think it would be better if more people could express their displeasure here.

1787

While this is true and I support it, I do urge them to be kind to others and try to keep some beliefs to themselves.

Because this is a global forum, and no longer only Chinese people. You have people from everywhere that play War Thunder on here.

4 Likes
1788

Though I doubt this part, this should be HQ-17A(the wheeled vehicle)'s function

1789

Is this the HQ-17 thread now

1 Like
1790

I am very glad that the tracked version was added. It would be worse on wheels.

1791

Anyways, this is Chinese Flanker thread.
Let’s not crowd it with HQ-17 discussion.

1792

Smin say, we don’t get anything in air in this update. 😣😖😫😩😩😩😩😩😭😭

1793

We need to push them to move the J-11A down to 13.3 at the very least.

Both the J-11 and J-11A haven’t received their unique cockpit RWR which is also very weird and it’s LITERALLY a SPO-15.

1 Like
1794

I could barely accept this。。。。。

2 Likes